This came through last week.
Trump’s Justice Department says the ACA is unconstitutional
The Justice Department will not defend the Affordable Care Act in court, and says it believes the law’s individual mandate — the provision the Supreme Court upheld in 2012 — has become unconstitutional.
Why it matters: The Justice Department almost always defends federal laws when they’re challenged in court. Its departure from that norm in this case is a major development — career DOJ lawyers removed themselves from the case as the department announced this shift in its position.
The details: The ACA’s individual mandate requires most people to buy insurance or pay a tax penalty. The Supreme Court upheld that in 2012 as a valid use of Congress’ taxing power.
When Congress claimed it repealed the individual mandate last year, what it actually did was drop the tax penalty to $0.
So the coverage requirement itself is still technically on the books. And a group of Republican attorneys general, representing states led by Texas, say it’s now unconstitutional — because the specific penalty the Supreme Court upheld is no longer in effect.
The Justice Department agreed with that position in a brief filed Thursday night.
DOJ said the courts should strike down the coverage requirement, as well as the provision of the law that forces insurance companies to cover people with pre-existing conditions.
From the LA Times:
Got a preexisting condition? The Trump administration wants insurers to deny you coverage
In its latest effort to undermine the Affordable Care Act — and in the process, raise premiums for many Americans — the Trump administration is urging a federal judge in Texas to throw out the law’s protections for people with preexisting conditions.
In other words, the administration wants insurers to be able to deny coverage to the people most in need of it, or to charge them considerably higher premiums than they’re allowed to charge today.
This is jaw-dropping. Even Republicans who’ve complained about Obamacare have been loath to undo the protections for people with preexisting conditions who are not covered by large employers’ health plans. That’s because the public supports them, and unequivocally so.
A Kaiser Family Foundation poll in June 2017 showed that 70% of those polled, including 59% of Republicans, wanted Washington to continue barring insurers from charging people with preexisting conditions more for their coverage. Federal law has long provided such protection for people with health benefits at work; the ACA extended it to people shopping independently for insurance.
But then, the administration has done just about everything in its power to toss older, less healthy people under the bus if they’re unfortunate enough not to be covered by employer health insurance plans.
From Andy Slavitt:
Before I get into it, I have to stop and just repeat this another way:
The DOJ, responsible for upholding the rule of law, is not defending the people in a frivolous lawsuit to say that wi5out the mandate, the rest of the ACA can’t be enforced. 2/
— Andy Slavitt 🇮🇱 🇺🇦 (@ASlavitt) June 8, 2018
NEW- CLARIFICATION OF WHAT TRUMP WANTS INSURANCE COMPANIES TO BE ABLE TO DENY OR UP-CHARGE FOR:
-Asthma inhaler
-Mild anxiety
-Alcoholism
-Toe fungus
-Being 50
-High blood pressure
-Birth controlIndividual coverage for cancer, diabetes, a transplant, epilepsy wouldn’t exist https://t.co/CRFEYwEP45
— Andy Slavitt 🇮🇱 🇺🇦 (@ASlavitt) June 8, 2018
300,000 people in each Congressional district have a pre-existing condition. Thursday Trump filed papers to end their guaranteed access to insurance.
Members of Congress who supported the tax cut set this in motion. Their phones might start ringing. https://t.co/GvjRSAul44
— Andy Slavitt 🇮🇱 🇺🇦 (@ASlavitt) June 9, 2018
If ever you needed a reason to work to flip the House and Senate in 2018, this is it.
The Trump administration is refusing to uphold the law. Your pre-existing condition will not be covered if this goes any further.#SaturdayMorning#AMJoy https://t.co/c5AFYlMk0R
— Holly Figueroa O'Reilly 🌸 (@AynRandPaulRyan) June 9, 2018
NEW: 👀 Politico reports Trump plans to roll out a new blueprint for HHS. If these turn out to be true, health programs could be relabeled as welfare.
Would require Congress’s support and makes midterms . . . important.
https://t.co/VLZn8exhfJ via @politico
— Andy Slavitt 🇮🇱 🇺🇦 (@ASlavitt) June 6, 2018
In light of yesterday’s news that the Justice Department will no longer be defending the Affordable Care Act, a reminder: the ACA isn’t collapsing. It’s being mugged. https://t.co/TvvtYrIJka
— Senator Angus King (@SenAngusKing) June 8, 2018
— Andy Slavitt 🇮🇱 🇺🇦 (@ASlavitt) June 10, 2018
Healthcare is WELFARE?
HUH?
This isn’t some political shouting match. They really are coming after you and your healthcare. And they will be stopped if we win, but they will most certainly go through with it if we lose. https://t.co/eoAdPKKiu3
— Brian Schatz (@brianschatz) June 9, 2018
Let’s be clear-they want to take away healthcare from everyone, except for those who had it before Obamacare. If you have a pre-existing condition, you will be once again SOL.
The Trump Administration decided to support axing pre-existing condition protections effective Jan 1, 2019.
It shows repeal-and-replace was not their goal. This is pure repeal. https://t.co/ReioE3zmUH
— Andy Slavitt 🇮🇱 🇺🇦 (@ASlavitt) June 8, 2018
Um no…they are only mad that he did this BEFORE the midterms. They aren’t coming out AGAINST what Dolt45 is proposing. Not in strong terms.
Republicans spent Friday fleeing from the Trump administration’s legal effort to dismantle Obamacare. W/ @jenhab:https://t.co/CLoQ84Ng6J
— Adam Cancryn (@adamcancryn) June 8, 2018
So, we have to tell everyone you know. Everywhere you go. Everyone knows someone with a pre-existing condition. Tell them that their vote in November 2018 LITERALLY could mean THEIR LIFE.
https://twitter.com/MHowe75/status/1006307729236004866?s=20
https://twitter.com/TheEradicator19/status/1006339938739204097?s=20
https://twitter.com/politvidchannel/status/1005440507676262400?s=20
https://twitter.com/MarcoParadiso76/status/1006262580355031043?s=20
https://twitter.com/Reigart/status/1006352879937048576?s=20
https://twitter.com/pbean25/status/1006263507489304576?s=20
The media is got damn killing me. Trump is an ignorant buffoon and they’re praising this sob because he’s white. They want him to succeed sooo bad so they can say see what he did that Obama couldn’t.
https://twitter.com/Tedderman1/status/1006363910772051968?s=20
https://twitter.com/ozzy512/status/1006278895103078403?s=20
https://twitter.com/leahmcelrath/status/1006340911385731073
https://twitter.com/Otter_News/status/1005924809467990018
Well damn!
Larry Kudlow has a heart attack after saying, “there’s a special place in hell for Prime Minister Trudeau”.
https://twitter.com/peterbakernyt/status/1006335241861070848
https://twitter.com/AP/status/1006335131492257792
Fabulous THREAD
https://twitter.com/KateAllDay/status/1005177065262469122?s=20
No, it’s not worth it…So, don’t do it
For Black Lives Activists, Engaging in Trump’s Pardon Politics Feels Like a Deal With the Devil
Is it “worth boosting the reputation of a racist, misogynist, and dangerously authoritarian administration?”
Brandon E. PattersonJun. 11, 2018 3:24 PM
Last Wednesday, Alice Marie Johnson,
a 63-year-old great-grandmother who served more than 20 years of a life sentence for a first-time, nonviolent drug offense, was released from federal prison in Alabama after President Donald Trump commuted her sentence at the request of Kim Kardashian West. The reality TV star, who got
involved after seeing a news video about Johnson, had met with Trump at
the White House to plead her case.
…………………..
“It’s clear that this is a PR stunt,” says Malkia Cyril, executive director and co-founder of the Center for Media Justice,
an Oakland-based group focused on the role of surveillance technology in incarcerating people of color. “That said, even a PR stunt can get some of our people free.”
“We have to make a decision,” she adds, “as to whether getting one or two, or three or four, or 10 people released from prison is worth
boosting the reputation of a racist, misogynist, and dangerously
authoritarian administration.”
https://www.motherjones.com/crime-justice/2018/06/black-lives-matter-donald-trump-pardon-politics-feels-like-deal-with-devil-alice-marie-johnson-1/
https://twitter.com/TheDailyEdge/status/1006254849405652992
https://twitter.com/Bencjacobs/status/1006264775435841537?s=20
Uh huh
https://twitter.com/JoshuaGreen/status/1006289611872784385?s=20
Uh huh
https://twitter.com/tomwatson/status/1006236897566515207?s=19
https://twitter.com/atDavidHoffman/status/1005994154726309889?s=19
The IMP from hell strikes again……………………..
https://twitter.com/axios/status/1006261402355617792
Demons 👹👹
https://twitter.com/CharlesMBlow/status/1006029631777050625
https://twitter.com/RawStory/status/1006258818207178754
Trump and that got damn Jeff Sessions
https://twitter.com/RVAwonk/status/1006264379321520128
More of this escapade at the link. Border Patrol needs to be disbanded along with ICE.
Dennis Rodman and Sean Hannity leading the US Delegation in Singapore
……………………
Just to compare…
IF this were 44…
and, he took along Ro-Ro and I’m trying to find a washed up sports star. got a suggestion?
The MSM would be howling.
THE.CURVE.FOR.UNQUALIFIED.WHITE.MEN.IS.REAL.
Anyone tweeted Marc Lamont Hill with today’s Supreme Court ruling?
Everything he does. Everything his administration does -is what it means to be a Republican.
YOU support putting children in cages.
YOU support ripping children away from their parents.
YOU support taking away healthcare from millions.
YOU support abestos.
YOU support killing trade.
YOU support raising the rent on poor people.
YOU support taking away voting rights.
YOU support pedophiles for public office.
THIS is the GOP, and if you aren’t voting for a Democrat – THIS is what you support.
Coming Out Swinging: A Model for How Democrats Should Immediately Put Republicans on the Defensive
EACH.AND.EVERY.WORD
ALL.OF.THIS
NBC/WSJ poll on whether Mueller investigation should continue,
By party:
Rs – 14% yes, 68% no
Ds – 79% yes, 8% no
Inds – 42% yes, 33% no
By education:
non-college men: 31% yes, 55% no
non-college women: 31% yes, 44% no
college grad men: 60% yes, 33% no
college grad women: 53% yes, 27% no
By race:
whites – 41% yes, 42% no
blacks – 75% yes, 5% no
Hispanics – 51% yes, 30% no
The impact of today’s SCOTUS opinion on Ohio’s voter purge process: if you don’t vote, the state can take away that right. We can argue about the case all you want but go register, update your registration & vote in EVERY election. Make it a priority to educate yourself & vote. https://t.co/fwE3wtXrPl
— Joyce Alene (@JoyceWhiteVance) June 11, 2018
Have @SenJohnMcCain, @JeffFlake and @SenatorCollins forgotten that they are actual sitting U.S. Senators with the power to bring legislation to the Senate floor? Indignant and apologetic tweets are not the checks and balances that we need. Without real action, all are #complicit.
— Paula (@PaulaBonaFide) June 11, 2018
Easy fix, caucus with the Dems and put an end to this idiocy by implementing the checks and balances enshrined in the constitution, but we all know you’d rather just tweet about it to appear as though you actually care. 🚨NEWSFLASH: Tweets are not substantial action. https://t.co/hNzn0FgOwg
— J-Rod in the PNW (@InTheKlick) June 11, 2018
You are a US Senator. You hold one of the most powerful offices in our government. Tweets are not checks and balances. Do your job! https://t.co/yX1l32DV70
— Angela York Crane (@toocanAnj) June 11, 2018
This is a nightmare scenario for voting rights advocates. SCOTUS has effectively given red states the green light to engage in voter purges that disproportionately affect minority and low-income communities. Sotomayor’s dissent is scathing. pic.twitter.com/ORCbXY29vc
— Mark Joseph Stern (@mjs_DC) June 11, 2018
If you’re upset about Trump
-ripping families apart at the border
-attacking Canada, our closest ally or
-undermining the Western Alliance and American standing in the world
Do something today to create accountability for him-help a Dem take back the House or Senate or both
— Neera Tanden 🌊 (@neeratanden) June 10, 2018
This case is a stark reminder that the Trump administration wants to turn back the clock on voting rights.
For decades, DOJ considered these purges to be illegal. Under the Trump administration, it flipped sides to support Ohio’s unnecessary restrictions on the right to vote.
— ACLU (@ACLU) June 11, 2018
Supreme Court says yes to voter purges, giving Republicans another way to rig elections. https://t.co/ZbPXrPhfIx
— Gabe #DreamActNow Ortíz (@TUSK81) June 11, 2018
https://twitter.com/deray/status/1006187965574459394
The Supreme Court might as well say only white people can vote in America. Corrupt down to the bone marrow.
The Supreme Court allowing minority and low-income communities to be targeted for disenfranchisement. How in the hell is this justice?
Anthony Bourdain Was Remarkable Because He Possessed Qualities That Shouldn’t Be
Damon Young
Friday 5:02pm
There is no shortage of affecting, poignant, gleaming and evocative tributes to Anthony Bourdain today, as those changed by his life and overwhelmed by his death are finding the words to articulate who he was (to them) and what he meant (to them). He was, from all reliable accounts, deserving of this level of veneration. Perhaps my most prominent memory of him stems from last year, when his Parts Unknown CNN show visited Pittsburgh, and there were some rumblings (including some from the mayor himself) that he didn’t show the city in the same glowing light in which the city wanted to see itself.
That he chose, when coming to the ’Burgh, to speak on our cavernous racial disparities instead of just our cool, new downtown eateries and bizarre pierogi races is what made him who he was. He was a rich and powerful (and white) man who used the privilege that his riches, his power, his whiteness and his maleness provided to shed a spotlight on those without it. He was a tourist of the world who still treated people and cultures like people and cultures and not pamphlets.
And, as Megan Greenwell articulated earlier today, he changed. He didn’t have to recognize his privilege. He didn’t have to be a champion of vulnerable people. He didn’t have to speak up. He could’ve continued being the man he was 20 years ago, and he’d be as rich and as famous and perhaps even as revered as he is today.
It shouldn’t be a big deal to be kind and to be curious and to have empathy and to recognize and appreciate context. It shouldn’t make a man—even a rich and famous white man—remarkable. But it is. And because it is, it did.
I was watching Parts Unknown yesterday on VOD. I happened to watch the one on Laos. Anyone who knows US history especially Vietnam era history would know about the “secret war” in Laos (1964-1973), the bombing, and the unexploded ordnance that still remains.
And I was thinking about Anthony Bourdain going to these places and wondering if he just got too close to too many of those who were on the receiving end of our arrogant and reckless foreign policy.
I am compelled to correct myself because “arrogant” and “reckless” do not begin to describe what we did to Laos. Words fail me. This is the kind of stuff that would warrant a trial at Nuremberg. How do we get away with it?
This wickedness here!
https://twitter.com/3ChicsPolitico/status/1006182849429598208
DEMONS, SG2
Malcolm Jenkins’ ‘You Aren’t Listening’ Silent Interview Is the Blackest Thing That Ever Happened This Week
Damon Young
Wednesday 4:33pm
I remember when I first learned that the deployment of young people during the protests, marches, boycotts and sit-ins to defeat Jim Crow was strategic.
Even as a kid, when I watched footage of that era, it was easy to notice that many of the people getting arrested, beaten, fire-hosed and bit by dogs were, well, kids—high school and college students, specifically. But I didn’t realize that it was intentional until my parents taught me. And the way my dad articulated why, particularly, has stuck with me for 30 years: “Even the worst white people could see that beating on kids was wrong.”
Error loading player:
Network error
Messaging and speeches and agendas are great and necessary. But they don’t induce the immediate and visceral reaction that images—still or moving—can. Hearing how fucked up segregation and racism are just doesn’t have the same impact as seeing a 17-year-old with a bloodied forehead from a police baton.
Anyway, earlier today, Philadelphia Eagles safety Malcolm Jenkins provided America with a similar lesson. Of course, the circumstances are vastly different. Jenkins is a rich and famous professional athlete with status, privilege and a large platform. He is not an 18- or 19-year-old in 1950s or ’60s Alabama or Mississippi. And while his life, as a black person in America, is more tenuous than a white person’s life, he’s not in the same sort of ceaseless mortal danger as those aforementioned teens.
But responding to droning, inane and unending questions and the intentional misinterpretations of the NFL players’ anthem protests with signs articulating exactly why they’re doing this was clever, bold and, all things considered, black as fuck. Because he knows, as they knew back during Jim Crow, that while (white) America has a selective-hearing problem, even the worst white people can see posters.
Oprah Keeps Painting of Enslaved Family in Her Home to Keep Her Grounded
Angela Helm
Today 6:30am
WOW
South Fulton, Ga.’s Entire Criminal Justice System Is Run by Black Women
Angela Helm
Yesterday 1:55pm
“Let black woman lead” is the mantra, and it looks as if one city in Georgia has taken it to heart.
Only a year after the creation of the fifth largest city in the state of Georgia, South Fulton has every aspect of its criminal justice system run by an African American woman, and unsurprisingly, its approach to criminal justice is one of the most progressive in the nation.
The Atlanta Voice recently did a cover story with eight women at the South Fulton County courthouse dressed in black on its cover. To use a popular but never tiring phrase, it is the epitome of black girl magic.
Six of the woman run the most important law enforcement positions in the city including:
Chief of Police Sheila Rogers
Chief Judge Tiffany Carter Sellers
Court administrator Lakesiya Cofield
Chief Court Clerk Ramona Howard.
City Solicitor LaDawn “LBJ” Jones
City Public Defender Viveca Famber Powell
According to the Atlanta Voice, these black women are quite deliberate in the way in which they carry out their duties to the citizens of the city.
“Our goal is to ensure justice for everyone,” said Judge Seller, who appointed Cofield as court administrator. “However, as African American women we are sensitive to the history of criminal justice in our country. We want to be an example of how to do things right.”
UH HUH
There is no chief scientist at the State Department, nor is there a chief scientist at the Department of Agriculture. And as Trump prepares to meet Kim Jong-un, he is doing so without the help of a science adviser trained in nuclear physics. https://t.co/y3BC0Sg3Ye
— Hiroko Tabuchi (@HirokoTabuchi) June 9, 2018
The thing is, you don’t need a nuclear scientist to help you count bribe money. What you need is to minimize the number of people in the room who might leak about it. https://t.co/JlCGOtCV4d
— Matthew Yglesias (@mattyglesias) June 9, 2018
https://twitter.com/sarahblakemedia/status/1006173520219508736
And his State media was on hand to get as much footage for their future propaganda similar to the buffoonish dotard’s collection for gaslighting purposes..
https://twitter.com/ForeignPolicy/status/1006178952573054976
https://twitter.com/MoveOn/status/1006176730837643264
https://twitter.com/3ChicsPolitico/status/1006169634750464000
Mercy. And the he Devil is still on the field.
STANDING OVATION
Did you see the white woman with her hands on her mouth? Is she clutching the pearls?
<
I’m still laughing. De Niro don’t give a fuck, he’s letting folks KNOW!
Word of the Day : June 11, 2018
Abrogate
verb AB-ruh-gayt
Definition
1 : to abolish by authoritative action : annul
2 : to treat as nonexistent
https://www.merriam-webster.com/word-of-the-day/abrogate-2018-06-11?pronunciation&lang=en_us&dir=a&file=abroga01&utm_campaign=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_source=wotd&utm_content=pron
Happy Birthday to Sasha Obama :)
.@Matt_Morrison welcomes the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School theatre department to the stage. #TonyAwards pic.twitter.com/5dxa9smeka
— CBS (@CBS) June 11, 2018
Don’t kid yourself, this is the @GOP where willful blindness to falsehoods and false prophets leads to fascism and the demise of democracy. Say what you need to say to assuage your own conscience, but you’re hip deep in this. So what are you going to do about it that matters? https://t.co/rwqOQ3mYja
— Col. Morris Davis (@ColMorrisDavis) June 11, 2018
Robert DeNiro has been telling y’all for a while he does not care for Trump.
Tonight, he decided to make it real clear.
h/t @dialmformovies pic.twitter.com/TDiRYypnzD
— Nerdy Wonka (@NerdyWonka) June 11, 2018
A standing ovation. And wild cheering. Everyone hates that mofo!
From AMJOY:
AM JOY 6/10/18
Immigrant children separated from parents reportedly held in…
Immigrant children separated from their parents are being held in what amount to cages according to observations made by Democratic U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley. Joy Reid and her panel discuss the inhumane policy of separating migrant families.
http://www.msnbc.com/am-joy/watch/immigrant-children-separated-from-parents-reportedly-held-cages-1252407363778
Manafort’s fate turned with the political interests in Ukraine
Julia Ioffe, contributing writer to The Atalantic, talks with Rachel Maddow about the chaotic political conditions in Ukraine in which Donald Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and Konstantine Kilimnik worked together, and Ukraine’s apparent deal with the Trump administration.
Jun.08.2018
Mueller adds to Manafort’s charges, indicts Russian operative too
Rachel Maddow reports on special counsel Robert Mueller adding more charges to Donald Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort’s case, including joint charges with Konstantine Kilimnik, a Russian intelligence operative who has worked with Manafort for years.
While lashing out at Canada, Trump accidentally shares his genuine beliefs
06/11/18 08:40 AM—UPDATED 06/11/18 08:47 AM
By Steve Benen
……………………….
The oddity about the broader dynamic is that Trudeau did largely the opposite of what Team Trump claimed In his press conference. Indeed, the prime minister tried to downplay differences among G-7 members, and he offered no meaningful criticisms of Trump or his administration. The White House’s tantrum against one of America’s closest allies seemed wholly unconnected to real-world events.
But take another look at Trump’s tweets and note that he said his tariffs are “in response to” Canada’s trade policy on dairy products. This is one of those rare instances in which Trump made a mistake by accidentally sharing his genuine beliefs.
Because when the president announced his tariffs on steel and aluminum, the official line was that the policy was necessary on national security grounds. By way of Twitter, Trump effectively admitted that his stated rationale was a lie.
And that may yet take the debate in an interesting direction. As Jon Chait noted, “[I]f there was any possible way for his tariffs to fail in court, it would be because he decided to blurt out an explicit confession that his motive is not the one he is legally obligated to base it on.”
Trump World can’t even throw a dishonest tantrum about an imaginary problem without screwing up in important ways.
UH HUH
UH HUH
A clear and present danger
by Liberal Librarian
What led to Trump’s outburst against Trudeau: Behind the scenes at the G7
By TONDA MACCHARLES
Ottawa Bureau
Sun., June 10, 2018
QUEBEC CITY—U.S. President Donald Trump greeted Prime Minister Justin Trudeau warmly Friday morning as he arrived at the G7.
Although he’d tweeted grumpily the night before that Trudeau was “so indignant” about American tariffs, Trump looked happy to see the prime minister. They shook hands and smiled for the cameras, as all eyes were on them.
……………………..
Trump held a news conference in which he promptly appeared to reject even the ideas on trade embodied in the communiqué he had agreed to, threatening to cut trade ties with any country who didn’t agree to a “zero tariffs” approach, telling reporters “the gig is up.”
“We’re like the piggy bank that everybody’s robbing, and that ends.”
Trump left, skipping the climate change and oceans sessions, but Trudeau took the stage Saturday evening to proclaim all G7 leaders had reached a joint statement, calling the summit a success and outlining his own talks with Trump.
It drew Trump’s wrath. Referencing Trudeau’s account of pushing back at the U.S., he tweeted Trudeau made “false statements.” He scorned Trudeau as appearing “meek and mild” in their meetings, but was “dishonest and very weak.”
Canadian officials insist, and Trudeau’s spokesperson tweeted, that Trudeau said nothing he hadn’t already said in public or in private to Trump.
On Sunday, Trudeau wouldn’t directly respond to Trump’s comments, only tweeting that the meaningful work the G7 had done was all that matters.
Canadian government officials were equally careful.
One called Trump’s actions rude, another said the U.S. president had personally insulted the prime minister and he would not engage on that level, adding that Trudeau was mindful of Trump’s concern — stated through Kudlow — that Trump was angry he’d been made to look weak in advance of the North Korea summit.
In the end, a summit meant to patch trade rifts ended with a deeper acrimony and questions about the Canada-U.S. relationship and how it could recover in the crucial weeks ahead.
https://twitter.com/Robert_E_Kelly/status/1005839601724878849?s=19
https://twitter.com/CharlesMBlow/status/1006029631777050625?s=19
On POINT, Mr. Blow.
https://twitter.com/JohnJHarwood/status/1005944575968628739?s=19
https://twitter.com/ianbremmer/status/1005891770251665408?s=19
Uh huh
https://twitter.com/brianefallon/status/1006112212459622400?s=19
Uh huh
Uh huh
https://twitter.com/Marmel/status/1006130442414616576?s=19
BWA HA HA HA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
https://twitter.com/JoyAnnReid/status/1006135986064187392?s=19
https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1006136728984473600?s=19
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are going on their first Royal Tour
https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-prince-harry-first-royal-tour-announcement/
Good Morning,Everyone 😄😄😄
Good Morning, Rikyrah, #Chics Family & Friends!