Open Thread | Pope Leo XIV Apologizes For Holy See’s Role In Legitimizing Slavery and Failing To Condemn It

I never thought that I would read these words.

The Associated Press
@AP
BREAKING: Pope Leo XIV makes historic apology for Holy See’s own role in legitimizing slavery and for failing to condemn i.t for centuries

Pope Leo XIV makes historic apology for Vatican’s role in legitimizing slavery
By NICOLE WINFIELD and PAOLO SANTALUCIA
Updated 11:59 AM CDT, May 25, 2026

VATICAN CITY (AP) — Pope Leo XIV made a historic apology on Monday for the Holy See’s role in legitimizing slavery and for having failed to condemn it for centuries, calling the Vatican’s record a “wound in Christian memory.”

Past popes have apologized for Christians’ involvement in the trans-Atlantic slave trade. But no pope had ever publicly acknowledged, much less apologized for, the role that past popes played in giving European sovereigns explicit authority to subjugate and enslave “infidels.”

History’s first U.S.-born pope, whose family history includes both enslaved people and slave owners, delivered the apology in his first encyclical, “Magnifica Humanitas,” (Magnificent Humanity), which was released Monday.

The sweeping manifesto is about safeguarding humanity in an era of increasing reliance on artificial intelligence. Leo raised the slave trade in relation to what he called the new forms of slavery and colonialism that the digital revolution is fueling.

Black American Catholics, activists and scholars have long called for the Holy See to atone for its role in the colonial-era trade in human beings, beyond generic apologies for the involvement of individual Christians.

“It is impossible not to feel deep sorrow when contemplating the immense suffering and humiliation endured by so many in stark contrast to their immeasurable dignity as persons infinitely loved by the Lord,” Leo wrote. “For this, in the name of the church, I sincerely ask for pardon.”

Shannen Dee Williams, historian at the University of Dayton and author of the 2022 history of American Black Catholic nuns, “Subversive Habits,” welcomed the apology as a “monumental step toward the kind of essential truth-telling and reparation that many Catholics have prayed and worked to witness.”

“The Catholic Church has never been an innocent bystander in the history of white supremacy,” said Williams. “Black Catholics have waited a long time to hear the Vatican speak honestly about the church’s leading roles in the trans-Atlantic slave trade and chattel slavery–and thus by extension the enduring systems of anti-Black racism in the world today.”

Continue reading

Posted in Catholic Church, Christianity, Open Thread, Politics, Slave Trade | Tagged , , , , , , | 46 Comments

Clarence B. Jones, Dr. King’s Trusted Attorney and Advisor, Dead at 95

RIP, Mr. Jones

Reverend Al Sharpton
@TheRevAl
I’m saddened by the news of the passing of Attorney Clarence Jones, Dr. King’s attorney and a mentor and friend to me. He was a brilliant strategist, lawyer, author, and philanthropist. So many of us owe a great debt to Clarence Jones.

“Clarence B. Jones, a confidant, lawyer and speechwriter for the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. during the civil rights struggles of the 1960s, who helped plan the March on Washington and drafted part of Dr. King’s celebrated “I Have a Dream” speech, died on Friday in Cupertino, Calif. He was 95.

His death, at an assisted-living facility, was confirmed by his son, Clarence Jr.
A brilliant organizer and a member of Dr. King’s inner circle, Mr. Jones planned protest campaigns; raised funds for Dr. King’s Southern Christian Leadership Conference; and coordinated legal strategies to challenge discriminatory laws, defend arrested demonstrators and fight lawsuits against their leaders.

He was one of the lawyers who represented four Black ministers in a seminal case of libel law, The New York Times v. Sullivan, in which the United States Supreme Court held that a public official could not win damages for criticism of his official performance without proving that published statements were made with deliberate malice. It was a landmark victory for the constitutional guarantee of freedom of the press, and cleared the way for reporting on widespread disorder and civil rights infringements in the South without fear of libel actions.

It was also a clarifying victory for civil rights leaders. “We regarded the suit as an effort to politically discredit the leadership of the direct action civil rights movement of Dr. King,” Mr. Jones told law students at the University of San Francisco in 2012. “The political objective of the lawsuit was to bankrupt and decapitate the civil rights leadership.

The many-sided Mr. Jones was at various times a California entertainment lawyer, the first Black partner…” – full article via https://nytimes.com/2026/05/25/us/clarence-b-jones-dead.html

#RIP
#ClarenceBJones

Continue reading

Posted in Black History, Civil Rights, Open Thread | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Happy Memorial Day!

African American Contributions to Memorial Day
National Mall and Memorial Parks

“Louisiana furnished 24,000 Black men to help put down the rebellion. You talk about strewing flowers upon the graves of our departed Comrades. Who are the ones that do it down South but the Black people?” – Comrade Boyle of Louisiana, speaking before a national gathering of the Grand Army of the Republic, 1907.[1]

“The Constitution that governs us was sustained by the sword and bayonet. The Black soldier played an important part, and as an evidence of their valor, look at yonder graves.” – M.C Maxfield, speaking at a DC Memorial Day ceremony in 1911.[2]

The Origins of Memorial Day
At the April 1901 dedication of the General John A. Logan Memorial, speakers like President William McKinley and New York Senator Chauncey Depew spoke of the nation’s debt to General Logan for his General Order No.11, which in 1868 formalized the annual floral decoration of the graves on Memorial Day, also referred to as Decoration Day.[3] While there is a historical debate over where and when the very first observation of Memorial Day took place, one of the earliest recorded observations of the holiday indisputably took place in Charleston, South Carolina, in the closing days of the Civil War.

On May 1, 1865, the freed people of Charleston gathered at the old racetrack to decorate the graves of 257 Union prisoners of war who had been hastily buried by the retreating Confederate army. The largely African American crowd watched the men of the 35th and 104th United States Colored Troops (USCT), along with the men of the famed 54th Massachusetts Infantry Regiment, perform drills before listening to speeches addressing the meaning of the long and bloody war. When the ceremonies were finished, the crowd dispersed to lay flowers on the graves of the men who had died fighting for Union and for liberty.[4]
Continue reading

Posted in Black History, Memorial Day, Open Thread, Politics | Tagged , , , | 21 Comments

Weekend Open Thread

Good Morning.
I hope that you are enjoying this weekend with family and friends.

Posted in Weekend Open Thread | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Open Thread | Trump DOJ: Yale’s Medical School Has Way Too Many Black Students

Trump DOJ: Yale’s Medical School Has Way Too Many Black Students
The administration’s view is that the mere presence of students of color at elite schools is incontrovertible proof of discrimination against white people.
By Madiba K. Dennie
May 18, 2026

In April 2025, the Department of Justice launched an investigation into Yale University, accusing its medical school of making admissions decisions based on race and, in so doing, violating the Civil Rights Act of 1964. On Thursday, May 14, the agency published its predictable findings: “Yale discriminated against other applicants to benefit preferred race classes of Black and Hispanic.” About a week earlier, Trump’s DOJ reached the identical conclusion about UCLA School of Medicine.

In both cases, there was no real doubt it would do so. The conservative legal movement has spent decades arguing that laws designed to remedy the effects of white supremacy—in education, elections, and elsewhere—require the entrenchment of white supremacy instead. And throughout his second term, Trump has aggressively built on this legal foundation for resegregation. The DOJ’s latest findings treat the mere existence of Black students as legal grounds for threatening a school’s federal funding—a standard that could make other medical schools more reluctant to admit Black students, which would have a devastating impact on the health of Black communities.

The DOJ first purports to show Yale’s “intent to discriminate” through a review of the medical school’s internal policies and practices. Specifically, the government alleges that Yale conducts interviews “that enable the committee to know applicants’ race and ethnicity,” and considers applicants’ socioeconomic status, which functions as a “racial proxy.”

The Trump administration’s smoking-gun evidence for this conclusion is an orientation packet that Yale provided to admissions personnel, which included a “holistic metrics model” produced by the Association of American Medical Colleges, an organization that helps accredit medical schools. The DOJ findings letter complains that AAMC’s model “shows a myriad of factors that appear unrelated to medicine.” And it features an image of AAMC’s graphic, with the most offensive characteristics—“race” and “national origin”—circled in red.

From there, the DOJ provides the results of its own “preliminary statistical aggregation” of Yale’s medical school admissions data for the incoming classes of 2023, 2024, and 2025, and found “no change in racial disparity between admitted students” before and after Students For Fair Admissions v. Harvard, the Supreme Court’s 2023 decision restricting race-conscious admission programs. In an amicus brief in that case, Yale argued that “no workable race-neutral alternatives” to affirmative action would produce a sufficiently diverse student body. “Given this statement,” the DOJ wrote, “the lack of any change in Yale’s admissions outcomes” demonstrates the school’s “willful failure to comply with that decision.” Put simply, there are more Black students at Yale than the Trump administration expected, and so, it suspects Yale is breaking the law.

The Yale findings show that the Trump administration is literally treating the presence of Black students as evidence of illegal racial discrimination. Because the Civil Rights Act prohibits recipients of federal financial assistance from engaging in such discrimination, this means that schools’ federal funds are at risk unless they reduce their Black student population to something Trump is more comfortable with. The report did not specify what this level might be, which means that for schools, the safest way to avoid suspicion is to not admit Black students at all.

Continue reading

Posted in Breaking News, DEI, discrimination, Education, Healthcare, Institutional Racism, Open Thread, Politics, Racism | Tagged , , , , , | 6 Comments

Open Thread | They Have Created a $1.7 Billion Dollar SLUSH FUND Through This Corrupt DOJ

DOJ sets up $1.7B ‘anti-weaponization’ fund after Trump drops IRS lawsuit
The massive taxpayer-backed fund was set up to settle what outside legal experts had called an “unprecedented” lawsuit filed by the sitting president against the government.
May 18, 2026, 8:55 AM CDT / Updated May 18, 2026, 11:39 AM CDT
By Ryan J. Reilly, Gary Grumbach and Megan Lebowitz

The Justice Department on Monday announced that it was establishing a $1.776 billion “Anti-Weaponization Fund” after President Donald Trump moved to dismiss a $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS over his leaked tax returns.

Justice Department officials announced that Trump and his co-plaintiffs would drop their IRS lawsuit as well as other claims of damages in connection with the 2022 search of Mar-A-Lago and in connection with the Russian collusion scandal “in exchange” for the creation of the fund, which DOJ said set up a “systematic process to hear and redress claims of others who suffered weaponization and lawfare.”

The establishment of the fund came ahead of court deadlines in the IRS case, which would have required the Trump administration to explain whether there was an actual case to be heard, given Trump’s control over the Justice Department’s actions.

ABC was first to report on the news of the settlement.

The massive fund would give Jan. 6 rioters pardoned by Trump a mechanism to seek taxpayer payouts for their claims of government overreach. The fund could even issue “formal apologies” to individuals who made claims against the government, the announcement stated. The fund will stop processing claims by Dec. 15, 2028, about a month before Trump’s second term is set to end.

The $1,776,000,000 amount available for the fund was based “upon the projected valuation of future claimants’ claims,” according to the Justice Department.

A group of House Democrats called the move a “$1.7 billion slush fund” that the president could use to “reward allies, including the nearly 1,600 defendants convicted or charged in connection with the January 6th attack on the Capitol.”

Rep. Joe Neguse, D-Colo., called the news “one of the most brazen examples of corruption we’ve seen from this administration.” The House Democrats’ Litigation Task Force filed a motion seeking to block what Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., called “pure fraud and highway robbery.”

The attorney general would appoint five members of the commission to oversee the fund, including one member to be chosen in consultation with congressional leadership, the DOJ said, adding that Trump could remove any member of the commission.

Kyle Griffin
@kylegriffin1
BREAKING:

It’s official. The Trump DOJ just confirmed the creation of a $1.776 billion slush fund that can be used to pay Trump allies who claim they’ve been wrongfully targeted by the Biden admin’s ‘weaponization’ — including, reportedly, Jan. 6 insurrectionists.
10:35 AM · May 18, 2026
https://x.com/kylegriffin1/status/2056398174894387551?s=20

Congressman Jamie Raskin, interviewed by Greg Sargent:

In our interview, Raskin pointed out other glaringly corrupt aspects to this. He noted that Treasury’s Judgment Fund is supposed to dole out its settlements and lawsuit judgments in accordance with actually existing court or administrative proceedings involving genuine victims of the government. As Raskin’s staff notes, depending on the details, the relevant agencies and government officials must sign off on these payments, and they’re disclosed to Congress and the public.

But with the new fund, it’s not clear the payments will look anything like this. It appears to transfer control over its payments to Trump alone, Raskin’s staff says, and decouples them entirely from all those agency processes.

“The Judgment Fund exists to settle valid judgments against the United States government,” Raskin told me. Trump and his allies, Raskin said, are “trying to take money from the Judgment Fund while eliminating any controls and oversight” and putting it under Trump’s “direct unilateral control.”

On top of that, Raskin added, this circumvents Congress in another way, since Congress never voted to create a fund structured this way. Which potentially renders it unconstitutional, too.

.
@GregTSargent
The terms of Trump’s slush fund appear to transfer control of $1.8 billion outside of US government entirely. That seems to circumvent Congress completely and put the payments to “victims” of ‘weaponization” beyond any congressional oversight or constitutional/legal constraints.
https://x.com/GregTSargent/status/2056420920151925041?s=20

Continue reading

Posted in Breaking News, Corruption, Current Events, Department of Justice, Open Thread, Politics | Tagged , , , , , | 6 Comments

Open Thread | Fear of Another Dark President

Excellent post from The Establishment Bar:

Fear of Another Dark President
Posted by Proud Establishment Dem
May 11, 2026

Barack Obama broke the Republican Party.

The election of the first Black man to ascend to the presidency of the United States was a watershed moment in our history. It was celebrated far and wide by those who understood just how much Black people in this country had to overcome to reach that moment. Obama himself had to toe the line in everything that he did. He had to be smart, but not too smart. He had to be passionate but couldn’t be an angry Black man. He had to be a man of faith, but not one whose values were somehow skewed by the more radical elements of the Black church. In a sea of White faces on the classroom wall of presidents, Barack Obama was always going to stand out. The question was always going to be whether he was the start of a new movement of people of color ascending to the presidency, or simply an anomaly who would revert to the same race and gender as our first 43 United States presidents.

Republicans openly rooted for the latter.

And in doing so, they outed themselves and their previously repressed racist urges. Because from 2009 on, Barack Obama needed to fail, even if it meant that the country itself would struggle. From the onset, when not a single House Republican voted for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, it was clear that the Republican Party would oppose everything Barack Obama wanted to accomplish. At a time when there was a needed 60-vote threshold for the Senate to pass legislation, Barack Obama gambled the entirety of his political capital during a six-month window to pass the Affordable Care Act, which was not supported by a single Senate Republican. At a time when 40 million Americans lacked sufficient healthcare, the Republican Party chose itself over the people in an effort simply to deny Barack Obama and Democrats a political win. After Democrats lost the House in 2010, Mitch McConnell famously stated that the GOP’s goal was to make Barack Obama a one-term president. Because in their eyes, they’d rather have the Black man fail than the American people succeed. The GOP-led 112th Congress passed a mere 283 acts, making it the least productive Congress on record and helping deny Barack Obama any political capital leading up to his re-election campaign. They were more than happy to deny the American people, and more importantly, Barack Obama, any kind of substantive win that would improve their everyday lives.

Of course, it wasn’t just elected Republicans who were against the Obama presidency. Conservative media knew the outrage their listeners had about seeing Barack Obama and his family reside in the White House, so they willingly chose to belittle them throughout the duration of his presidency. Their goal was to imply that Barack Obama was somehow beneath the honor of office, and they attempted to portray him as such time and time again. No “scandal” was too small, whether it was Barack Obama with his foot on the Resolute Desk, or him wearing a tan suit, or him saluting a Marine with a coffee in hand, or him bowing too far to the Japanese emperor. When it came time for Obama’s re-election, the birther movement was in full effect, a clear effort led by none other than Donald Trump to delegitimize the country’s first Black president. Between do-nothing Republicans in Congress and a conservative media hellbent on restoring the normality of having a White man in the Oval Office, Barack Obama faced a challenging political landscape for re-election in 2012. It seemed as if Mitch McConnell might be able to accomplish his goal after all.

But Obama overcame this to win re-election.

And in doing so, broke GOP strategist Karl Rove, who had a legendary meltdown on election night when an Obama win in Ohio clinched his re-election. Because, like so many of his ilk, Rove couldn’t fathom that his beloved country would elect a Black man not once but twice to the presidency of the United States of America. This meant that Obama was more than a curiosity; that he was a legitimate politician who could not only win as a relative unknown but could also win with four years of governing under his belt. Obama’s re-election meant that the country now had a baseline for what Black people could do in the nation’s highest office, and this terrified the country’s conservatives. Gone were their long-held stereotypes about Black men being “lazy” and “uneducated.” Gone were their stereotypes about Black men and those around them being corrupt. Gone were their stereotypes about Black men being unfaithful in their marriage and absentee fathers. Gone were stereotypes about Black men being “low IQ” or uneducated. Barack Obama proved that Black men could be as successful as White men, and this fact alone caused the wiring malfunction of so many racists’ brains in this country. As his successful two terms ended, the conservative movement now had a choice: would they accept that their embedded racist ideas were wrong, or would they double down and try to elevate one of their own to undo all the “damage” that Barack Obama had caused over the previous eight years?

As we all know, they went the latter route. And in doing so, they completely removed the hoods they had been so desperately trying to hide throughout their lives.

Starting in 2015, Donald Trump gave them the permission they so desperately needed. To say the quiet part out loud. To proudly display the Confederate flag. To legitimize and empower White supremacist groups, which had grown exponentially during the Obama presidency. The red Trump hat became synonymous with hate. Hate against people of color. Hate against Muslims. Hate against immigrants. Hate against gay people. Hate against “wokeness” and DEI. Violence against protestors was encouraged at his rallies. Those asked to speak frequently provided overtly racist talking points and rhetoric. Republican voters who saw their beloved country slipping away under Obama now felt that there was a chance to return to normality under someone like Trump. For them, Barack Obama wasn’t an inspiration; he was an aberration. An error that shouldn’t have happened. The One Big Ass Mistake America (OBAMA) bumper stickers were proudly portrayed on the pickup trucks of Trump supporters and became a common sight in rural areas. Barack Obama wasn’t on the ballot in 2016, but his legacy was. And like Donald Trump himself, Republicans wanted nothing better than to do everything they could to erase or diminish what Barack Obama accomplished during his two terms in office.

The pendulum of history always swings. How hard it swings depends on the grandness of the moment. The first election of Barack Obama was one of our country’s grandest swings, and the swing back is being felt as forcefully as we’ve ever felt anything in our history. What we’re seeing in our current political climate is the continued fallout of Barack Obama’s presidency as it relates to Black power. Because it was Black voters who led the charge in electing him twice. It was Black voters who saw through the racism and incompetence of Donald Trump three separate times and have overwhelmingly voted against him. It has been Black political leaders, specifically Black women, who publicly challenged and held Donald Trump accountable for his actions, from Leticia James to Fani Willis to, most recently, L. Louise Lucas and her efforts in the Virginia redistricting fight. Trump’s all-out war on Black leaders hasn’t gone unnoticed and is quite obvious when you look at the places he’s targeting for his ICE enforcement actions. Cities like Washington, D.C., Los Angeles, and Chicago all have mayors of color. Insisting that these mayors “need help” in preventing violence in their cities is a clear dog whistle attempting to link leaders of color to crime. This type of racial targeting has been a pattern throughout the Trump administration’s second term and is a clear signal to his base that their fears of the “other” are being heard and acted upon.

Last week’s VRA ruling has simply been a continuation of the policies handed down by the Trump administration. Under the guise of rigging the House to keep Republicans in control, what it has done is
give southern Republicans permission to attack Black political power through redistricting. Their mission is simple: to dilute Black power in a way that keeps them and other people of color from working their way up the ranks. Ultimately, they firmly believe that doing so will prevent any future Barack Obama from ever again ascending to the nation’s highest office. But it has also served as a way to overtly assert their dominance over Black men and women. The message these state legislatures are giving is out and proud: we don’t think Black men and women are deserving of political power. Because of that, we are going to eliminate districts that provide that power. It’s no longer simply about giving Donald Trump a GOP-led House, but instead has become an opportunity to disenfranchise Black voters by carving up their communities and no longer allowing them to be represented in Congress by a fellow Black man or Black woman.

At its core, the redistricting war is a battle to reinstate Jim Crow. This is a battle that Republicans are all too happy to revisit. But unlike Jim Crow 1.0, we now know what to look for. We know the end goal Republicans have in mind. But the toothpaste is out of the tube. Black Americans know what it’s like to have political power at the local level. They know what it’s like to have one of their own in the White House. No matter how hard Republicans try, they cannot erase the fact that 21st-century America has experienced a Black president. The pushback has been hard. It has been intense. In many ways, it has been devastating to see our country return to pre-Civil Rights Act protections for Black voters. Yet this is now our fight. Redistricting is a microcosm for a Republican Party that wants people of color to once again serve as permanent second-class citizens. But they won’t. Not in Tennessee. Not in Alabama. Not in Louisiana. Not anywhere.
Continue reading

Posted in Black Excellence, Black Voter Suppression, Black Voters, GOP, Open Thread, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , | 24 Comments

Weekend Open Thread

Good Morning.
I hope that you are enjoying this weekend with family and friends.

We have been wondering about this for centuries

Posted in Weekend Open Thread | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Open Thread | About Tennessee Gerrymandering

Eric Holder
@EricHolder
My statement on Tennessee’s immoral gerrymander:

Continue reading

Posted in Black Voter Suppression, Black Voters, Democracy, Gerrymandering, GOP, Open Thread, Politics | Tagged , , , | 28 Comments

Open Thread | Nothing But Truth, Mr. Sellers

Spitting nothing but truth:

MCBN
@MCBNNEWSS
Sellers: “We are going to be the first generation to actually leave this country worse than the one that we inherited.
Bakari: And I think for black millennials, uh the the the progress that our parents and grandparents gave us, that we’re watching being ripped away from us is something that our generation is going to have to really wrestle with and and figuring out how we get out of this conundrum.

If somebody fell asleep in 1896 and woke up today in 2026, they would simply say the only difference is now Negroes have a TV show and we wear nice suits.

They they swapped out clan hoods for Brooks Brothers suits. And and that is the problem.

I mean, Plessy v. Ferguson was 7-1 and it gave birth to 50 years of Jim Crow.

What we have with this court right now, what we’re seeing is is watching people who have fought and died and bled so that we would have access to the ballot box, so that we would have access to our voices being heard in Congress, being ripped away.

And and I think that there is a casual laughter from people we believe to be our friends on the right who are showing us true colors today because the most sacred or one of the most sacred acts you have in the United States of America is the ability to cast a ballot and elect someone and send them to Congress, the state house or mayoral seat that represents your interest and now black folks throughout the South are being silenced.

https://x.com/i/status/2054025111011783074

Continue reading

Posted in Black Voter Suppression, Black Voters, Elections, Gerrymandering, GOP, Open Thread, Politics, Supreme Court | Tagged , , , , , , , | 6 Comments