Open Thread | The Cuts to Medicaid and Medicare Will Affect Families All Around The Country

And, it didn’t need to happen.
The cuts were for no other reason than to pay for TAX CUTS FOR MILLIONAIRES AND BILLIONAIRES

Peter Morley
@morethanmySLE

Starting 1/1/27: CUTS to Medicaid will total roughly $1T & SNAP CUTS will be $400B. These are NOT just CUTS, they are death sentences. For the first time ever, states via block grants MUST decide who lives & who dies.

BLOOD will be on the hands of the GOP & Trump Administration.
6:32 PM · Aug 2, 2026
https://x.com/morethanmySLE/status/2083984280422691038

This thread was very informative.

James F. Love IV
@JamesFLoveIV
Jul 31

Short 🧵

Re: Medicaid reductions enacted in 2025 and the evidence available as of July 2026.

Impact on Nursing Homes:

Medicaid is the primary payer for more than 60% of nursing-home residents.

A 2024 HHS/ASPE study found that Medicaid payments covered, on average, only about 82% of the actual cost of caring for Medicaid residents.

For roughly 40% of nursing homes, Medicaid payments covered 80% or less of those costs.

aspe.hhs.gov/reports/assess…

That does not mean Medicaid supplies 60% of nursing-home revenue, however, because Medicare and private-pay residents generate different reimbursement amounts.

So Medicaid is financially critical even when it isn’t the majority of total revenue.

The American Health Care Association (AHCA) surveyed 363 nursing-home providers in June 2025 and asked what they would have to do if federal Medicaid funding were reduced:

77% would reduce their Medicaid census.
58% would reduce current staff.

55% would limit hiring/recruitment.
27% said they would have to close facilities.

This is a survey of operators saying that federal Medicaid reductions would force them to close facilities, not a government projection.

ahcancal.org/News-and-Commu…

How many residents could be displaced?

There were approximately 1.2 million nursing-home residents as of July 2025.

If 27% of facilities ultimately closed, a simple proportional estimate would be:

1.2 million × 27% ≈ 324,000 residents.

GAO found that 44 states cover some assisted-living services through Medicaid.

No reliable studies say “X% of assisted-living revenue comes from Medicaid.” The percentage varies a lot by facility and state.

For example, Sonida Senior Living reported that Medicaid represented 7.7% of its resident revenue in 2025, down from 10.1% in 2024.

Another large senior-living operator, Brookdale Senior Living, reported only 4.8% of resident-fee revenue from government reimbursement programs (primarily Medicaid and Medicare) in 2025.

sec.gov/Archives/edgar…

Therefore, assisted living as an industry is considerably less Medicaid-dependent than nursing homes, although Medicaid-dependent assisted-living facilities can be severely affected.

Bottom line:

Nursing homes:

Medicaid importance. Very high

Medicaid primary payer >60% of residents.

Typical Medicaid revenue share
Roughly 20–30%+ nationally, varying greatly

Facilities potentially forced to close 27% in AHCA survey.

U.S. facilities forced to close. appx. 14,742.

Potential nursing-home displacement if 27% closed ~324,000.

The really significant point is that the 27% number is not an invented political talking point. It comes from a 2025 survey of nursing-home operators themselves.

But it would be misleading to say “27% of nursing homes will close because of Medicaid cuts.” The accurate statement is “27% of surveyed nursing-home providers said Medicaid cuts would force them to close facilities.”

ahcancal.org/News-and-Commu…

The problem is particularly serious because nursing-home Medicaid isn’t simply optional insurance for many residents. Medicaid pays for nursing-facility care after Medicare’s limited skilled-nursing coverage ends, including long-term care that Medicare generally doesn’t cover.

I constructed this thread to prepare young families with parents in Nursing Homes to move their parents into their homes once the Republican enacted cuts to Medicaid become effective January 1st, 2027—in 5 months.

324,000 of them are coming home.

Thank this guy.

End 🧵

Continue reading

Posted in Affordable Care Act, Breaking News, Economy, GOP, Healthcare, Medicaid, Medicare, Open Thread, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Weekend Open Thread

Good Morning.

I hope that you are enjoying this weekend with family and friends.

…………………………………….

One of my oldest friends came into town. She came because she had secured tickets to the Obama Presidential Center. So, we went along with Peanut and her mother.
I have to say that I was impressed. It really is an entire campus. We were there from Noon until it closed at 5 pm.
What did I love?
There was no wasted space. There were exhibits and short movies and artwork everywhere.
There was a lot of sitting space. Every floor. For people with mobility issues, they maybe couldn’t take in everything, but, there was a lot for them to take in on every floor. While the rest of your party that could walk and linger, there were clear spots where you could sit and take in a lot of the exhibit on every floor.

Every floor told a different story about the Obamas and their lives together.
• Their beginnings in Chicago.
• The beginnings of their political journey in Chicago.
• The 2 years of running for President
• What President Obama faced and accomplished while President
• The People’s House and how the Obamas used the WH to display what is best in America.
• Their goodbye at the end of those 8 years.

There was something interactive on every floor.

The displays were wonderful.

It was a review of history, and I am glad to have lived through it. I appreciated the floor where it outlined all the policy that happened during the Obama Presidency. Had a long talk with Peanut about the substantial achievements of 44.
Continue reading

Posted in Weekend Open Thread | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Open Thread | The Truth About Dr. Fauci’s Service

The GOP Attack on Dr. Fauci is because they have nothing to run on for November 2026 Elections, so they are trying to use distractions about 2020 and COVID to try to activate the GOP rubes.

Gene Trevino
@GenoVeno73

Dr. Anthony Fauci advised SEVEN Presidents (both Republican and Democratic) on infectious diseases — Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Barack Obama, Donald Trump, and Joe Biden — that’s 38 years.

In these 38 years Dr. Fauci advised on EIGHT major outbreaks:
– Anthrax attacks/biodefense
– SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome)
– Avian influenza/bird flu (primarily H5N1)
– West Nile virus
– MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome)
– Ebola
– Zika
– Chikungunya

Dr. Fauci also advised on THREE major pandemics:
– HIV/AIDS
– 2009 H1N1 influenza (swine flu) — Officially declared a pandemic by the WHO
– COVID-19

Out of 38 years, advising SEVEN U.S. President’s from both parties, @RandPaul @SenRandPaul thinks Dr. Fauci LIED to the American people under only ONE “president” – @realDonaldTrump

HERE’S THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER:
– Trump fucked up the handing of the covid pandemic
– Trump doesn’t want history to remember him as a fuck up
– He’s using Dr. Anthony Fauci as his scapegoat

Can’t you people see this “scapegoat” pattern with Trump when he loses, or when he fucks up — he ALWAYS wants to cast blame on someone that isn’t him. ALWAYS!!
8:57 PM · Aug 1, 2026
https://x.com/GenoVeno73/status/2083658387464626361

Posted in 2026 Elections, COVID-19, COVID-19 Vaccine, Elections, Health, Immunization, Open Thread, Politics | Tagged , , , , | 26 Comments

Open Thread | A Further Reminder About Mail Ballots for the November 2026 Election

Democracy Docket
@DemocracyDocket

California rejected nearly 150,000 mail-in ballots in its June primary, 63% of which were not postmarked or received within the state’s legally permitted window.

We’re breaking down why recent changes by USPS could be to blame: demdock.com/3TYw3F2

I am going to continue to highlight stories like this, because I want people to recognize the precautions that need to be taken for the November 2026 Election.

IF you are going to use a Mail Ballot to vote for the November 2026 Election:

1. IF you have the option of using an Election Jurisdiction Mail DropBox – DO SO.
2. IF the only way for you to return your Mail Ballot is via the USPS….
DO NOT DROP IT OFF IN A MAILBOX.
DO NOT GIVE IT TO YOUR POSTMAN.
TAKE IT TO YOUR LOCAL POST OFFICE. GO INSIDE. REQUEST THAT THE POSTAL WORKER PUT A DATE STAMP ON YOUR BALLOT RETURN ENVELOPE.

IN.FRONT.OF.YOU.

There is no reason for your ballot to be rejected because of a Post Office Date Stamp.
……………………………….

California rejects nearly 150,000 mail ballots despite voter safeguards
By Yunior Rivas
July 24, 2026

California rejected nearly 150,000 mail-in ballots in its June primary, exposing how votes can still go uncounted even in a state with some of the nation’s strongest voter protections.

According to recently released state data, county election officials rejected 148,241 mail-in ballots of the more than 8.5 million total returned last month.

The overwhelming driver were ballots that were deemed too late: 93,479 ballots were rejected because they were not postmarked or received within California’s legally permitted window, accounting for 63% of all rejected mail ballots.

That percentage is especially notable, according to Mindy Romero, founder and director of the Center for Inclusive Democracy.

“The increase in late ballots is helping to drive that increase in rejected ballots overall,” Romero told Democracy Docket. “And that’s concerning.”

The vast majority of California voters — about 90% — cast their ballots by mail.

California mails a ballot to every active registered voter and counts mailed ballots that arrive up to seven days after Election Day, as long as they are postmarked by Election Day.

The U.S. Supreme Court recently upheld states’ authority to use similar receipt deadlines, rejecting a Republican National Committee challenge to a Mississippi law that counts ballots postmarked by Election Day and received within five business days.

The Court held that federal law does not require states to possess every ballot by Election Day.

The grace period is meant to protect voters from ordinary mail delays. But California’s experience shows that a grace period may only be as protective as the bureaucratic systems on which it depends.

The U.S. Postal Service acknowledged in a rule that took effect in December that most postmarks are applied when an envelope reaches an automated processing facility, not when a voter places it in a mailbox, hands it to a carrier or brings it to a local post office. The agency also admitted that its Regional Transportation Optimization program will make gaps between possession and postmarking more common.

“The date inscribed by a postmark applied at a processing facility may be later than the date that the mailpiece was first accepted by the Postal Service,” the agency wrote.

Under the new transportation system, post offices serving ZIP codes more than 50 miles from regional processing centers generally lost a second daily truck trip. Mail collected during the day can remain at a local post office until the next morning before being transported for processing and postmarking.

The Postal Regulatory Commission warned that pilot versions slowed mail and that the program would disproportionately burden rural communities.

A ballot placed in the mail on Election Day can therefore remain in postal custody overnight, receive a postmark the next day and become invalid under California law — even if it reaches an election office during the seven-day window.

Posted in 2026 Elections, Elections, Mail Ballots, Open Thread, Politics, Voter Disenfranchisement, Voter Suppression | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 17 Comments

Open Thread | Once More…THE PARTIES ARE NOT THE SAME

NO….
The Parties are NOT THE SAME.

Gene Trevino
@GenoVeno73

🚨 DO YOU GET IT NOW!??!

1️⃣ August 1, 2018 — Democratic amendment for an extra $250 million in election security grants to States.

Sought additional federal grants for States to upgrade voting equipment and cybersecurity ahead of the 2018 midterms. This would have secured federal elections by giving States more resources to protect against foreign hacking and system vulnerabilities.
47 Republicans VOTED NO (only 1 Republican supported this).

SO DON’T EVER TELL ME DEMOCRATS DON’T WANT SECURE ELECTIONS.

2️⃣ June 27, 2019 — Securing America’s Federal Elections (SAFE) Act (H.R. 2722):
Required voter-verified paper ballots, cybersecurity standards for voting systems, domestic manufacturing of equipment, and grants for upgrades and audits. This would have secured federal elections by creating a paper trail for every vote, reducing cyber risks.
184 Republicans VOTED NO (only 1 Republican supported this).

SO DON’T EVER TELL ME DEMOCRATS DON’T WANT SECURE ELECTIONS.

3️⃣ March 3, 2021 — For the People Act (H.R. 1):
Expanded automatic/same-day registration, early and mail voting, independent redistricting, campaign-finance rules, and some election-administration measures. This would have secured federal elections by expanding access, reducing barriers, standardizing practices, and increasing transparency.
209 Republicans VOTED NO.

SO DON’T EVER TELL ME DEMOCRATS DON’T WANT SECURE ELECTIONS.

4️⃣ June 22, 2021 — For the People Act (S. 2093):
This was the Senate version of the same bill above. It would have secured federal elections through expanded access, uniform standards, and greater oversight.
All 50 Republicans in the Senate VOTED NO.

SO DON’T EVER TELL ME DEMOCRATS DON’T WANT SECURE ELECTIONS.

5️⃣ August 24, 2021 — John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act (H.R. 4):
Would have restored and updated the Voting Rights Act preclearance formula so certain jurisdictions would need federal approval before changing voting rules. This would have secured federal elections by blocking discriminatory voting changes before they take effect.
All 212 Republicans VOTED NO.

SO DON’T EVER TELL ME DEMOCRATS DON’T WANT SECURE ELECTIONS.

6️⃣ October 20, 2021 — Freedom to Vote Act (S. 2747):
This was a narrower version of the bill above focused on national standards for early/mail voting, automatic registration, protections for election officials, and anti-subversion rules. This would have secured federal elections by creating consistent access rules and reducing opportunities for partisan interference.
All 50 Republicans in the Senate VOTED NO.

SO DON’T EVER TELL ME DEMOCRATS DON’T WANT SECURE ELECTIONS.

7️⃣ November 3, 2021 — John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act (S. 4):
This was the Senate version of the Voting Rights Act preclearance restoration. This would have secured federal elections by reinstating federal oversight against discriminatory changes.
48 Republicans in the Senate VOTED NO.

SO DON’T EVER TELL ME DEMOCRATS DON’T WANT SECURE ELECTIONS.

8️⃣ January 19, 2022 — Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act:
This combined the Freedom to Vote Act’s national standards with the John Lewis Act’s preclearance restoration. This would have secured federal elections by pairing expanded access rules with restored federal protections against discrimination.
All 50 Republicans in the Senate VOTED NO.

SO DON’T EVER TELL ME DEMOCRATS DON’T WANT SECURE ELECTIONS.

————————————–

The @GOP @HouseGOP @SenateGOP @Republicans really are NOT concerned with securing our federal elections.

ALL of these Democratic proposals would have provided better security, better standards, and better oversight over federal elections.

Absent from these Democratic proposals is the “voter ID” measure, but LITERALLY EVERY STUDY has proven there is NO NATIONWIDE VOTER FRAUD — by immigrants, non-citizens, or anyone else.

And yet, these Democratic proposals would have secured our elections. REPUBLICANS VOTED NO!!

9:25 PM · Jul 26, 2026
https://x.com/GenoVeno73/status/2081491111936225542

Continue reading

Posted in 2026 Elections, Democratic Party, Elections, GOP, Open Thread, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , | 41 Comments

Weekend Open Thread

Good Morning.

I hope that you are enjoying the weekend with Family and Friends.

The Tuckers: Meet the descendants of America’s first African family

Posted in Black History, Weekend Open Thread | Tagged , , | 21 Comments

Open Thread | Why It’s A NO for Me With This ‘ Class Over Race’ Nonsense

This poster has it nailed perfectly.

𝓝𝓲𝓴𝓴𝓲 𝓑𝓪𝓻𝓷𝓮𝓼
@NikkiBarnes

Here’s the issue that parts of white America have with Black people. And I’m speaking specifically about the openly racist elements of the Republican Party and the DSA activists trying to reshape the Democratic Party.

Black Americans are a smaller percentage of the population, but we wield enormous electoral power because of where we are geographically concentrated, particularly throughout the South. The reality is that many Democratic candidates cannot win office without overwhelming support from Black voters. That’s the math, and that’s the source of the frustration.

The DSA is approaching politics primarily through the lens of class. Black America has always had to navigate both race and class. For generations, we’ve fought to gain access to economic opportunity, not because capitalism has always worked for us, but because we’ve historically been excluded from wealth. That’s why our families have encouraged paths that can create generational stability, whether through entrepreneurship, higher education, skilled trades, or athletics. We don’t apologize for wanting economic security after centuries of being denied it.

The same misunderstanding shows up in the attacks on the Jewish community. Jewish institutions have long invested in building community through philanthropy, education, entrepreneurship, and mutual support. Those traditions have helped create resilient institutions and opportunities that benefit countless people beyond their own community.

When Black and Jewish communities work together, you see two groups that understand what it means to survive discrimination while also believing in building institutions, creating opportunity, and investing in future generations. That coalition has accomplished real change, and that’s exactly why some people find it threatening.

Instead of confronting the economic and political failures within their own movements or families, some activists try to convince Black voters that our priorities should be subordinated to their ideological project. We’re not interested in that. Our communities have spent generations organizing, building, voting, and creating institutions that uplift people. We won’t abandon that work to satisfy someone else’s political theory.

The Black and Jewish coalition remains strong. We intend to continue building power, expanding opportunity, and defeating efforts to divide us. Move accordingly.
1:13 AM · Jul 26, 2026
https://x.com/NikkiBarnes/status/2081186149733703834

Continue reading

Posted in 2026 Elections, Black Voters, Open Thread, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Open Thread | The DNC Chooses South Carolina as the Lead Off State for the 2028 Election Season

The DNC has put South Carolina first on the list of 2028 Primary States.
The response by some who are upset about this, but, don’t want to admit that they are upset.

Jonathan Martin
@jmart
My riff: I doubt any formidable Democrat would dare skip South Carolina entirely — the symbolism of rejecting a state where half the primary voters are Black makes that a non-starter. Yet it’s certainly possible the new, six-state early window followed immediately by Super Tuesday will tempt more progressive candidates to downplay the state.
Why would Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), for example, spend significant time and money in South Carolina when she can potentially create a firewall in Nevada, New Mexico and Michigan, all states now in the early-vote window? AOC could spend (just) enough time in South Carolina and count on (just) enough of an establishment-lane fracture to post a respectable vote there and not have to worry if that means she comes in fourth. In years past that would be fatal to a campaign — now it could garner the coveted “better-than-expected.”
https://x.com/jmart/status/2081389367210250250

The response by some:

Jaime Harrison
@harrisonjaime
I said this in another post… skip and play games at your own peril. Voters know the difference between someone who shows up because they genuinely want to be in our communities and fight for us, and someone who only shows up to check a box.
And Black voters are on the internet, too.
We see what some say about their cousins, aunties, and grandmas in South Carolina and other states. There is a reason why so many Black family reunions and folks from up north send their kids down to SC for the summer: FAMILY. More than 80% of African Americans can trace at least one ancestor back to the state.
We may live in different states today, but we’re still one community.
We talk. We share. We remember.
Bottomline… if you want to be the leader of this diverse party and President of the US then you will need to show that you can build a diverse coalition that includes all of us… this new calendar is going to force the cream to rise to the top!
https://x.com/harrisonjaime/status/2081392131587858540

Another offended party:

thomas pyhnchedoff
@f3ldm4n
9h
congrats on sticking up for the most conservative people in the democratic coalition jaime! doing a great job hindering any sort of progress the country could possibly make. bet the checks are cashing nice tho
https://x.com/f3ldm4n/status/2081390782791971236

Jaime Harrison
@harrisonjaime
I don’t think you understand how foolish you sound. Every right I enjoy as a Black man in this country exists because of the blood, sweat, tears, courage, and They are what progress in America looks like.

For many of us, there would have been no progress without them. A check? Hell, you should be writing them one. The debt this nation owes them can never be repaid. Your disrespect isn’t just offensive. It’s historically ignorant.
https://x.com/harrisonjaime/status/2081394170829156411

Jaime Harrison
@harrisonjaime
The establishment gathered this morning. Turns out it wasn’t billionaires, consultants, or smoke filled rooms. It was Black church mothers in Sunday hats. Some folks see “the establishment.” I see the women who built this party. And yes… I think (and DNC members agreed) they deserve a powerful voice in choosing the party’s nominee. #SC1st
https://x.com/harrisonjaime/status/2081389769297175038

This person does not lie. I remember quite clearly in 2020, when before ANY significant Black votes had been counted, they were telling Joe Biden that he needed to DROP OUT OF THE RACE. I remember those articles and those television segments.
Which is why one of my favorite things to do is to go watch clips of the South Carolina Primary in 2020. How the race was literally called at 7:02 pm EST.
The looks on the BernieBros MSM Faces were hilarious. They were shook! They didn’t know what had just happened…
BWA HA HA HA HA AH AHA HA H A

And, then, go watch the videos from Super Tuesday 2020. They continued to be shooketh.

🪷 A Harris Democrat✊🏾
@sephius1999
Bernie Sanders tried to do it. When Bernie Sanders won New Hampshire he tried to say we didn’t need a primary in SC and to skip both SC and NV, and that he should just be anointed the nominee.
He knew he couldn’t bullshit Blk ppl in SC, so he wanted their votes suppressed.

https://x.com/sephius1999/status/2081403139324797326

Marcus Ferrell
@Marcus4America

One unspoken truth about why SC being first in the primary is, it’s going to expose a lot of consultants. Y’all do realize that the lack of Black consultants and staffers on campaigns are a real thing. You’re gonna need that to win SC. Half of them won’t even know who to hire.
2:30 PM · Jul 27, 2026
https://x.com/Marcus4America/status/2081748998591815828

Karen Finney
@finneyk
15h

YES!!! Not to mention that the mostly white, male consultant class assumes they know better how to talk to women, Black, & Brown people but don’t think we know how to message to white people – yet we’re the ones code switching all day!
https://x.com/finneyk/status/2081936662611787948

Posted in 2028 Elections, Black Voters, Democratic Party, Elections, Open Thread, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Open Thread | The Insults Towards Our Troops Never Ends With This Administration

I didn’t want to believe it, because it was such a level of fundamental disrespect towards our military…
and, it was disgusting to boot.

Aric Toler
@AricToler

The Pentagon removed the names of 4 servicemembers who died in Jordan from their official list of casualties. They explain that this is because “their deaths occurred after President Trump declared a cease-fire in the war in April.”

Free gift link: nytimes.com/2026/07/23/us/…
https://x.com/AricToler/status/2080415257630027860

Geoff
@GeoffBrown82

Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth are trying to George Orwell (1984) these heroes. They won’t be erased with the official lies and government propaganda of lying cowards.

Lt. Tyler James Feehan, 25

Pvt. Isabella Gonzales, 19

Sgt. Angel Rampersad, 28

Sgt. Michael Emmanuel Swinton, 30
https://x.com/GeoffBrown82/status/2080667621872050516

Number of U.S. Troop Deaths Suddenly Appears Lower on Pentagon Website
Three military officials and a Pentagon spokesman gave conflicting explanations for why the number of Americans killed in the Iran war had changed.
By Helene Cooper, Lara Jakes and John Ismay
July 23, 2026

On Wednesday, the Pentagon reported on its casualties website that a total of 18 American service members had been killed during the war in Iran.

By Thursday, the Defense Department had lowered that number, reporting that 14 American troops had been killed in the war.

Three military officials said that one reason behind the change was that the Trump administration decided to remove four service members killed this past weekend from the list — three in Jordan and one in northern Iraq — because their deaths occurred after President Trump declared a cease-fire in the war in April.

The officials described sensitive internal discussions on the condition of anonymity.

The acting press secretary for the Pentagon, Joel Valdez, attributed the change instead to “temporary data disruptions” on the website that he suggested would be quickly fixed.

Since the cease-fire collapsed, the Pentagon has provided little information about the American military strategy and has been slow to release information about troops’ injuries. The last major Pentagon briefing on the war was in early May.

The Defense Department has said that disclosing Iranian strikes on bases where U.S. troops are housed would compromise operational security.

The Pentagon withheld information about three Iranian strikes last week in Jordan that injured dozens of U.S. service members and damaged several helicopters, according to several U.S. officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss operational matters.

After an Iranian strike in Jordan on Friday killed three soldiers, the Pentagon’s chief spokesman, Sean Parnell, acknowledged that the number of U.S. military casualties since July 7 had risen to nearly 100.

Defense Department officials say they are bound by law to report troop deaths, but not injuries. Critics, including Democratic senators, say the Trump administration is obligated to inform the public about the conduct of the war.

“The administration seems to have a real hard time being honest about what is going on — not just about casualties, but about the whole war in general,” said retired Lt. Gen. Ben Hodges, a veteran of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, who commanded U.S. forces in Europe at the start of Mr. Trump’s first term.

General Hodges said that downplaying deaths during war indicated “an unwillingness or inability to aggressively learn from mistakes.”

Continue reading

Posted in Breaking News, Open Thread, Politics, U.S. Military | Tagged , , , , | 70 Comments

Weekend Open Thread

Good Morning.
I hope that you are enjoying this weekend with family and friends.

Posted in Weekend Open Thread | Tagged , | 1 Comment