Good Morning.
I hope that you are enjoying this weekend with family and friends.
The concert that never was😂😂
Good Morning.
I hope that you are enjoying this weekend with family and friends.
The concert that never was😂😂
Plain and simple.
Willie Ross Jr. Knee Deep
@RossKneeDeep
Very interesting:All four Black House Republicans are retiring — the timing tells an important story.
All four Black Republican members of the House of Representatives have announced they will not seek reelection after this term. The departures are happening simultaneously, during a second Trump presidency that has taken a documented and systematic approach to eliminating diversity programs, removing Black officials from positions across the federal government, and installing a senior leadership team that is overwhelmingly white in composition.The GOP spent several years — particularly in the period following 2020 — making visible and stated efforts to recruit and elect Black candidates to Congress. The argument was both moral and strategic: a party that aspires to govern a diverse country should reflect some of that diversity in its elected representation. Those efforts produced, among others, the members now leaving.
The context in which they’re leaving is specific. The current administration has not only rolled back diversity, equity, and inclusion programs across federal agencies — it has done so with explicit rhetoric that frames such programs as discriminatory against white people. Trump has personally circulated content that carries white nationalist framing. Black officials who were appointed or retained in earlier periods have been removed in significant numbers.
For Black Republicans who spent careers making the argument that their party had room for them and for the communities they represented, this environment creates a specific and difficult position. The argument they were making — that Black voters and Black candidates could find meaningful space in Republican politics — faces the most direct possible institutional challenge from the top of their own party.
The four retirements are individual decisions made for individual reasons. But four simultaneous exits by the entire Black Republican caucus in the House, in this specific moment, is a pattern that carries meaning beyond any single member’s calculus.
What it means for the party’s stated commitment to diversity, for Black voters who supported Republican candidates, and for the candidates who might have considered following this path is a question the departures make more urgent rather than less.Where does Black MAGA go from here?
https://x.com/RossKneeDeep/status/2050032845049987378?s=20
I never thought that I would read these words.
The Associated Press
@AP
BREAKING: Pope Leo XIV makes historic apology for Holy See’s own role in legitimizing slavery and for failing to condemn i.t for centuries

Pope Leo XIV makes historic apology for Vatican’s role in legitimizing slavery
By NICOLE WINFIELD and PAOLO SANTALUCIA
Updated 11:59 AM CDT, May 25, 2026
VATICAN CITY (AP) — Pope Leo XIV made a historic apology on Monday for the Holy See’s role in legitimizing slavery and for having failed to condemn it for centuries, calling the Vatican’s record a “wound in Christian memory.”
Past popes have apologized for Christians’ involvement in the trans-Atlantic slave trade. But no pope had ever publicly acknowledged, much less apologized for, the role that past popes played in giving European sovereigns explicit authority to subjugate and enslave “infidels.”
History’s first U.S.-born pope, whose family history includes both enslaved people and slave owners, delivered the apology in his first encyclical, “Magnifica Humanitas,” (Magnificent Humanity), which was released Monday.
The sweeping manifesto is about safeguarding humanity in an era of increasing reliance on artificial intelligence. Leo raised the slave trade in relation to what he called the new forms of slavery and colonialism that the digital revolution is fueling.
Black American Catholics, activists and scholars have long called for the Holy See to atone for its role in the colonial-era trade in human beings, beyond generic apologies for the involvement of individual Christians.
“It is impossible not to feel deep sorrow when contemplating the immense suffering and humiliation endured by so many in stark contrast to their immeasurable dignity as persons infinitely loved by the Lord,” Leo wrote. “For this, in the name of the church, I sincerely ask for pardon.”
Shannen Dee Williams, historian at the University of Dayton and author of the 2022 history of American Black Catholic nuns, “Subversive Habits,” welcomed the apology as a “monumental step toward the kind of essential truth-telling and reparation that many Catholics have prayed and worked to witness.”
“The Catholic Church has never been an innocent bystander in the history of white supremacy,” said Williams. “Black Catholics have waited a long time to hear the Vatican speak honestly about the church’s leading roles in the trans-Atlantic slave trade and chattel slavery–and thus by extension the enduring systems of anti-Black racism in the world today.”
RIP, Mr. Jones
Reverend Al Sharpton
@TheRevAl
I’m saddened by the news of the passing of Attorney Clarence Jones, Dr. King’s attorney and a mentor and friend to me. He was a brilliant strategist, lawyer, author, and philanthropist. So many of us owe a great debt to Clarence Jones.
“Clarence B. Jones, a confidant, lawyer and speechwriter for the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. during the civil rights struggles of the 1960s, who helped plan the March on Washington and drafted part of Dr. King’s celebrated “I Have a Dream” speech, died on Friday in Cupertino, Calif. He was 95.
His death, at an assisted-living facility, was confirmed by his son, Clarence Jr.
A brilliant organizer and a member of Dr. King’s inner circle, Mr. Jones planned protest campaigns; raised funds for Dr. King’s Southern Christian Leadership Conference; and coordinated legal strategies to challenge discriminatory laws, defend arrested demonstrators and fight lawsuits against their leaders.
He was one of the lawyers who represented four Black ministers in a seminal case of libel law, The New York Times v. Sullivan, in which the United States Supreme Court held that a public official could not win damages for criticism of his official performance without proving that published statements were made with deliberate malice. It was a landmark victory for the constitutional guarantee of freedom of the press, and cleared the way for reporting on widespread disorder and civil rights infringements in the South without fear of libel actions.
It was also a clarifying victory for civil rights leaders. “We regarded the suit as an effort to politically discredit the leadership of the direct action civil rights movement of Dr. King,” Mr. Jones told law students at the University of San Francisco in 2012. “The political objective of the lawsuit was to bankrupt and decapitate the civil rights leadership.
The many-sided Mr. Jones was at various times a California entertainment lawyer, the first Black partner…” – full article via https://nytimes.com/2026/05/25/us/clarence-b-jones-dead.html
#RIP
#ClarenceBJones




African American Contributions to Memorial Day
National Mall and Memorial Parks
“Louisiana furnished 24,000 Black men to help put down the rebellion. You talk about strewing flowers upon the graves of our departed Comrades. Who are the ones that do it down South but the Black people?” – Comrade Boyle of Louisiana, speaking before a national gathering of the Grand Army of the Republic, 1907.[1]
“The Constitution that governs us was sustained by the sword and bayonet. The Black soldier played an important part, and as an evidence of their valor, look at yonder graves.” – M.C Maxfield, speaking at a DC Memorial Day ceremony in 1911.[2]
The Origins of Memorial Day
At the April 1901 dedication of the General John A. Logan Memorial, speakers like President William McKinley and New York Senator Chauncey Depew spoke of the nation’s debt to General Logan for his General Order No.11, which in 1868 formalized the annual floral decoration of the graves on Memorial Day, also referred to as Decoration Day.[3] While there is a historical debate over where and when the very first observation of Memorial Day took place, one of the earliest recorded observations of the holiday indisputably took place in Charleston, South Carolina, in the closing days of the Civil War.On May 1, 1865, the freed people of Charleston gathered at the old racetrack to decorate the graves of 257 Union prisoners of war who had been hastily buried by the retreating Confederate army. The largely African American crowd watched the men of the 35th and 104th United States Colored Troops (USCT), along with the men of the famed 54th Massachusetts Infantry Regiment, perform drills before listening to speeches addressing the meaning of the long and bloody war. When the ceremonies were finished, the crowd dispersed to lay flowers on the graves of the men who had died fighting for Union and for liberty.[4]
Continue reading
Good Morning.
I hope that you are enjoying this weekend with family and friends.
Trump DOJ: Yale’s Medical School Has Way Too Many Black Students
The administration’s view is that the mere presence of students of color at elite schools is incontrovertible proof of discrimination against white people.
By Madiba K. Dennie
May 18, 2026
In April 2025, the Department of Justice launched an investigation into Yale University, accusing its medical school of making admissions decisions based on race and, in so doing, violating the Civil Rights Act of 1964. On Thursday, May 14, the agency published its predictable findings: “Yale discriminated against other applicants to benefit preferred race classes of Black and Hispanic.” About a week earlier, Trump’s DOJ reached the identical conclusion about UCLA School of Medicine.
In both cases, there was no real doubt it would do so. The conservative legal movement has spent decades arguing that laws designed to remedy the effects of white supremacy—in education, elections, and elsewhere—require the entrenchment of white supremacy instead. And throughout his second term, Trump has aggressively built on this legal foundation for resegregation. The DOJ’s latest findings treat the mere existence of Black students as legal grounds for threatening a school’s federal funding—a standard that could make other medical schools more reluctant to admit Black students, which would have a devastating impact on the health of Black communities.
The DOJ first purports to show Yale’s “intent to discriminate” through a review of the medical school’s internal policies and practices. Specifically, the government alleges that Yale conducts interviews “that enable the committee to know applicants’ race and ethnicity,” and considers applicants’ socioeconomic status, which functions as a “racial proxy.”
The Trump administration’s smoking-gun evidence for this conclusion is an orientation packet that Yale provided to admissions personnel, which included a “holistic metrics model” produced by the Association of American Medical Colleges, an organization that helps accredit medical schools. The DOJ findings letter complains that AAMC’s model “shows a myriad of factors that appear unrelated to medicine.” And it features an image of AAMC’s graphic, with the most offensive characteristics—“race” and “national origin”—circled in red.
From there, the DOJ provides the results of its own “preliminary statistical aggregation” of Yale’s medical school admissions data for the incoming classes of 2023, 2024, and 2025, and found “no change in racial disparity between admitted students” before and after Students For Fair Admissions v. Harvard, the Supreme Court’s 2023 decision restricting race-conscious admission programs. In an amicus brief in that case, Yale argued that “no workable race-neutral alternatives” to affirmative action would produce a sufficiently diverse student body. “Given this statement,” the DOJ wrote, “the lack of any change in Yale’s admissions outcomes” demonstrates the school’s “willful failure to comply with that decision.” Put simply, there are more Black students at Yale than the Trump administration expected, and so, it suspects Yale is breaking the law.
The Yale findings show that the Trump administration is literally treating the presence of Black students as evidence of illegal racial discrimination. Because the Civil Rights Act prohibits recipients of federal financial assistance from engaging in such discrimination, this means that schools’ federal funds are at risk unless they reduce their Black student population to something Trump is more comfortable with. The report did not specify what this level might be, which means that for schools, the safest way to avoid suspicion is to not admit Black students at all.
DOJ sets up $1.7B ‘anti-weaponization’ fund after Trump drops IRS lawsuit
The massive taxpayer-backed fund was set up to settle what outside legal experts had called an “unprecedented” lawsuit filed by the sitting president against the government.
May 18, 2026, 8:55 AM CDT / Updated May 18, 2026, 11:39 AM CDT
By Ryan J. Reilly, Gary Grumbach and Megan Lebowitz
The Justice Department on Monday announced that it was establishing a $1.776 billion “Anti-Weaponization Fund” after President Donald Trump moved to dismiss a $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS over his leaked tax returns.
Justice Department officials announced that Trump and his co-plaintiffs would drop their IRS lawsuit as well as other claims of damages in connection with the 2022 search of Mar-A-Lago and in connection with the Russian collusion scandal “in exchange” for the creation of the fund, which DOJ said set up a “systematic process to hear and redress claims of others who suffered weaponization and lawfare.”
The establishment of the fund came ahead of court deadlines in the IRS case, which would have required the Trump administration to explain whether there was an actual case to be heard, given Trump’s control over the Justice Department’s actions.
ABC was first to report on the news of the settlement.
The massive fund would give Jan. 6 rioters pardoned by Trump a mechanism to seek taxpayer payouts for their claims of government overreach. The fund could even issue “formal apologies” to individuals who made claims against the government, the announcement stated. The fund will stop processing claims by Dec. 15, 2028, about a month before Trump’s second term is set to end.
The $1,776,000,000 amount available for the fund was based “upon the projected valuation of future claimants’ claims,” according to the Justice Department.
A group of House Democrats called the move a “$1.7 billion slush fund” that the president could use to “reward allies, including the nearly 1,600 defendants convicted or charged in connection with the January 6th attack on the Capitol.”
Rep. Joe Neguse, D-Colo., called the news “one of the most brazen examples of corruption we’ve seen from this administration.” The House Democrats’ Litigation Task Force filed a motion seeking to block what Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., called “pure fraud and highway robbery.”
The attorney general would appoint five members of the commission to oversee the fund, including one member to be chosen in consultation with congressional leadership, the DOJ said, adding that Trump could remove any member of the commission.
Kyle Griffin
@kylegriffin1
BREAKING:It’s official. The Trump DOJ just confirmed the creation of a $1.776 billion slush fund that can be used to pay Trump allies who claim they’ve been wrongfully targeted by the Biden admin’s ‘weaponization’ — including, reportedly, Jan. 6 insurrectionists.
10:35 AM · May 18, 2026
https://x.com/kylegriffin1/status/2056398174894387551?s=20
Congressman Jamie Raskin, interviewed by Greg Sargent:
In our interview, Raskin pointed out other glaringly corrupt aspects to this. He noted that Treasury’s Judgment Fund is supposed to dole out its settlements and lawsuit judgments in accordance with actually existing court or administrative proceedings involving genuine victims of the government. As Raskin’s staff notes, depending on the details, the relevant agencies and government officials must sign off on these payments, and they’re disclosed to Congress and the public.
But with the new fund, it’s not clear the payments will look anything like this. It appears to transfer control over its payments to Trump alone, Raskin’s staff says, and decouples them entirely from all those agency processes.
“The Judgment Fund exists to settle valid judgments against the United States government,” Raskin told me. Trump and his allies, Raskin said, are “trying to take money from the Judgment Fund while eliminating any controls and oversight” and putting it under Trump’s “direct unilateral control.”
On top of that, Raskin added, this circumvents Congress in another way, since Congress never voted to create a fund structured this way. Which potentially renders it unconstitutional, too.
.
@GregTSargent
The terms of Trump’s slush fund appear to transfer control of $1.8 billion outside of US government entirely. That seems to circumvent Congress completely and put the payments to “victims” of ‘weaponization” beyond any congressional oversight or constitutional/legal constraints.
https://x.com/GregTSargent/status/2056420920151925041?s=20
Good Morning.
I hope that you are enjoying this weekend with family and friends.
We have been wondering about this for centuries