Happy July 4th!

Happy July 4th!
Enjoy family and friends today.

As it always should have been.

As always, we present this classic:

What is the 4th of July to the American Negro?

From The NYT:

5 Words That Changed America
Jamelle Bouie
There is a moment for every American when she first encounters the Declaration of Independence. For most, it comes to her as scripture — the highest and most sacred text in the nation’s civic religion, encapsulated by its moving assertion of human equality: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”

This Declaration is a profound statement of values: of a universal aspiration for human freedom. As President Gerald Ford said in a speech marking the nation’s bicentennial, “The Declaration is the Polaris of our political order — the fixed star of freedom. It is impervious to change because it states moral truths that are eternal.”

As a matter of civic faith, this is what the Declaration means. As a matter of history, however, the story is much more complicated.

As Thomas Jefferson wrote it, the Declaration was less an affirmation of human equality than a pointed claim about the nature of political authority and a powerful assertion of the right of revolution, informed by the Enlightenment writings of John Locke and other social contract theorists. It was meant as an argument about the preconditions of government — an assertion of the purity of prelapsarian life — not a road map for emancipation.

“The opening assertions of ‘self-evident’ truths concern men in a ‘state of nature’ before government was established,” the historian Pauline Maier observed in “American Scripture: Making the Declaration of Independence.” “With regard to persons, equality meant simply that no one held authority over others by right of birth or as a gift of God.”
In other words, Jefferson was channeling a common sentiment in Revolutionary-era America, “a political orthodoxy whose basic principles colonists could pick up from sermons or newspapers or even schoolbooks without ever reading a systematic work of political theory,” Maier wrote. Just look to Thomas Paine, who wrote in “Common Sense” — published about six months before the signing of the Declaration — that “all men being originally equals, no one by birth could have a right to set up his own family in perpetual preference to all others forever.”

Jefferson’s equality was a thought experiment. It did not extend to political society, nor was it meant for those placed beyond the political community. Men could be created equal and still be different; men could be created equal and still be subordinate.

This, for many of the Patriot leaders, was a given.
But then there were those outside the circle of belonging: women, Natives, landless laborers and, most starkly, Black Americans, both free and enslaved. They did not read — or, most likely, hear — the Declaration as an abstract claim about a prelapsarian past. They understood it as a radical statement of principle for the present. And they wielded this principle against a society that would not extend the Revolutionary promise of freedom and self-government to those held in bondage.

It was their Declaration — the one that they made for themselves — that stood for a universal claim of human equality in the here and now. And it was their Declaration that would come to supplant Jefferson’s historical and metaphysical one as the linchpin of America’s civic ideal, passing from Black Americans to abolitionists to the Republican Party and Abraham Lincoln, who consecrated their Declaration at Gettysburg as the spiritual foundation for a “new birth of freedom” and a “government of the people, by the people, for the people,” established “four score and seven years ago” in 1776.

It is this Declaration that is under assault from a political movement that rejects the credal vision of the American Republic in favor of an exclusionary racial nationalism, that defines American citizenship by blood and heritage, that sneers at the “five words about equality” in the Declaration and that worships at the altar of hierarchy and caste. But it is also this Declaration that still inspires Americans to fight for their place in this country and demand their right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

It is hard to exaggerate the alacrity with which Black Americans seized on the rhetoric of the Revolution to demand a free and equal place in the new and nascent American Republic.

Continue reading

Posted in Happy July 4th | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Open Thread | A Post for America

This is a love letter to this country from The Establishment Bar:

My America
Posted by Liberal Librarian
July 02, 2026

Let me tell you about my America.

My America is where my neighbors set off fireworks when Mexico wins a World Cup match. It is also where my neighbors set off fireworks when the US wins.

My America is a Salvadoran cook making Japanese sushi at a restaurant owned by Koreans.

My America is where my white sister-in-law lives with her Black ex-husband in a platonic relationship and takes care of her daughter’s golden doodle.

My America is where my Black grandniece dresses as a different anime character every Halloween.

America is not, and never has been, a land of blood and soil. At least, not when it is true to itself.

My America is an America which recognizes the crimes it has committed in the past and rectifies them.

My America is the America of Langston Hughes, Dolores Huerta, Dorothy Day. And this America is far stronger than the one of Andrew Jackson, Joe McCarthy, and Donald Trump.

My America is the America where its people strive to make perfect an imperfect Union, knowing that it will never be perfect, but in the struggle is where life and hope lay.

Continue reading

Posted in Open Thread, Politics | Tagged , , , | 32 Comments

BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP STANDS

SHOULD HAVE BEEN 9-0

Fourteenth Amendment
Section 1

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

5-4
F-O-H

SCOTUSblog
@SCOTUSblog

The court strikes down President Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship, holding that children born in the U.S. to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are “subject to the jurisdiction” of the U.S. and are citizens at birth.

supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf…

SCOTUSblog
@SCOTUSblog

Replying to @SCOTUSblog
Justice Kavanaugh filed an opinion concurring in the judgment and dissenting in part. Justice Thomas wrote a dissenting opinion, joined by Justice Gorsuch. Justices Gorsuch and Alito also wrote dissenting opinions.

https://x.com/SCOTUSblog/status/2071966331029627105

TRUTH

Greg Sargent

‪@gregsargent.bsky.social‬
The explosion of MAGA rage at birthright citizenship ruling confirms again that MAGA is really a movement for ethnic cleansing.

As we discuss on the pod, it’s telling that sealed border and end to TPS/asylum don’t sate MAGA. They want dramatic ethnic purges.

Listen:
newrepublic.com/article/2125…

Greg Sargent

‪@gregsargent.bsky.social‬
Here’s the argument: MAGA can’t accept a sealed border, an end to TPS/asylum, and the closing of other legal pathways as success. Their movement isn’t really about securing the border. It’s about ethnically cleansing the country.

My exchange with Raul Pinto on this:

newrepublic.com/article/2125…
https://bsky.app/profile/gregsargent.bsky.social/post/3mplnyybibk26


Continue reading

Posted in Birthright Citizenship, Supreme Court | Tagged , , , , , | 30 Comments

Open Thread | The Court That Will Believe Absolutely Anything Is ‘Race-Neutral’

More excellent writing from The Atlantic:

The Court That Will Believe Absolutely Anything Is ‘Race-Neutral’
The majority gives Trump yet more license to discriminate.

By Adam Serwer

Trump-administration officials have made no secret of their desire to purge the United States of nonwhite immigrants. Donald Trump has declared, “If you import The Third World, you become The Third World,” a common refrain repeated by his advisers. Trump has also said that immigrants have “bad genes,” that they are genetically predisposed to crime, and that they are “poisoning the blood of our country”—coming, as they are, “from Africa, from Asia, all over the world.”

In many instances, Trump’s vitriol has been directed at Black immigrants, particularly from Africa and the Caribbean. He has said that allowing in Haitian immigrants was a “death wish for our country” and that “they all have AIDS,” and accused them of eating household pets. He has referred to Haiti as a “filthy, dirty, disgusting” place, a “shithole” country, while complaining that America doesn’t take in enough people from Norway and Sweden. That last statement is crucial—Trump has not proved hostile to all immigrants. Removing all possibility that the president’s xenophobia is nonracial, the administration has implemented what is effectively a whites-only refugee policy that accepts solely South Africans of European descent.

Much of this evidence, including statements by Kristi Noem, the former head of the Department of Homeland Security, was presented to the Supreme Court when it considered in Mullin v. Doe whether the Trump administration had lawfully ended temporary protected status for hundreds of thousands of immigrants from Syria and Haiti. Yet the right-wing majority shrugged off the clear racially discriminatory intent in the president’s rhetoric, and sided with Trump. As long as one can find a valid justification for the policy decision, the opinion suggests, then it doesn’t actually matter what Trump said. The racist statements mean nothing so long as, in another, hypothetical universe, Trump could have made the same policy choice without making the racist statements first.

The immediate impact of Thursday’s ruling will be that 350,000 Haitians and 6,100 Syrians are now at risk of deportation, despite the dangers they face in their home countries. Yet the ruling has implications beyond immigration law, because it suggests that no amount of evidence of racial animus against Black people will be enough to convince a majority of justices that racial discrimination has occurred. As Guy-Uriel Charles, a professor at Harvard Law, put it to me, Justice Samuel Alito’s majority opinion “basically sets up an impossible burden for plaintiffs because race is rarely going to be the sole justification” for a policy.

“None of the cited statements by either the President or the Secretary was overtly racial, and in substance all expressed policy views that could rest on race-neutral justifications,” Alito wrote in his opinion. “One may oppose TPS and favor tighter restrictions on immigration for economic or other reasons that have nothing to do with race.”

Alito’s insistence that “none of the cited statements” was “overtly racial” does not pass the laugh test. Trump’s remarks were not just “overtly racial”; they were the essence of racism: assuming the value of individual human beings solely on the basis of their origin, regardless of their individual characteristics. Shortly after the decision, the White House adviser Stephen Miller gushed, “We can finally remove these Haitian illegal migrants.”

Continue reading

Posted in Open Thread, Politics, Racial Bias, Racial Oppression, Racial Profiling, Racism, Supreme Court, Systematic Racism | Tagged , , , , , , , | 18 Comments

Open Thread | The Disability Community is UNDER ATTACK By This Administration

Celine Castronuovo
@cecelou18

SCOOP: White House adviser Stephen Miller was the driving force behind DOJ’s memo authorizing states to institutionalize people with disabilities rather than fund community-based care, said people briefed on the situation.

From @benjaminpenn and me:
https://x.com/cecelou18/status/2069518347641786506

Without the Department of Education there to lead the charge and challenge against evil like this, who is there to stop this?

ost
user avatar
LongTime🤓FirstTime👨‍💻
@LongTimeHistory

Texas school district plans to segregate 5,000 students with disabilities—bus them to far away separate, but equal facilities.

Now even Trump’s Dept. of Education has opened civil rights investigation.

“Longer bus rides could create challenges for students with medical needs,” federal government report states.

“Schools cannot exclude students with disabilities simply because of their disability status.”
The school district’s plan would move kids from their neighborhood schools starting this year—to designated “Special Education Specialty Schools.”

Parents argue that it removes children from their communities, long-time friendships, routines, and established support networks.

Houston Independent School District officials claim busing students with disabilities will help the district address long-standing compliance issues.
https://x.com/LongTimeHistory/status/2071202703833985232

Just horrible

LongTime🤓FirstTime👨‍💻
@LongTimeHistory

Replying to @LongTimeHistory
Texas’ largest school district is consolidating special education services to select campuses beginning in 2026-27.

This prompted an ongoing investigation by the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights.

One of the parents’ core concerns about the changes is that they were issued without the families’ consent.

“It’s unethical, it’s amoral, it’s illegal,” Mayer Cunningham said of the district’s changes.
Despite the investigation, Houston ISD has defended the changes and is moving forward with them.

Link to full story:

houstonpublicmedia.org/articles/educa…

By — Bianca Seward @HoustonPubMedia
https://x.com/LongTimeHistory/status/2071259374694088956

Posted in ADA, Breaking News, Disability Community, GOP, Open Thread, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , | 59 Comments

Weekend Open Thread

Good Morning.
I hope that you are enjoying this weekend with family and friends.

Continue reading

Posted in Weekend Open Thread | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Posted Without Comment

From Speaker Preacher:

Acyn

‪@acyn.bsky.social‬
Johnson: If we lose the midterms, these Democrats will turn every committee of Congress into an investigative body, and they’ll go after the president’s family, the cabinet, his donors, friends, half of you in this room will be targeted. I run the protection program. We’ll take care of you.
https://bsky.app/profile/acyn.bsky.social/post/3mp7girjxvs2d

Posted in 2026 Elections, Corruption, Elections, GOP, Open Thread, Politics | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Open Thread | Checking In With the Worst Court Since Taney

The majority of this Court are just awful people.

PBS News

‪@pbsnews.org‬

Follow
The Supreme Court sided with the maker of the Roundup weedkiller Thursday in a ruling expected to block thousands of lawsuits alleging it failed to warn people the product could cause cancer. to.pbs.org/43VOkVA
https://bsky.app/profile/pbsnews.org/post/3mp4pnbpnjo2g

NAACP
@NAACP

#BREAKING: Today, the Supreme Court cleared the way for the Trump administration to strip Temporary Protected Status (TPS) from more than 350,000 Haitian immigrants, putting them at immediate risk of deportation to a country still in crisis.
“The Supreme Court has given the green light to deport over 350,000 people, jeopardizing their safety, all while ignoring clear equal protection principles. It’s a shame that this is the America we’ve come to be.” —President and CEO @DerrickNAACP

Read our full statement. naacp.org/articles/naacp…
https://x.com/NAACP/status/2070175380711899218

Jameel Jaffer

‪@jameeljaffer.bsky.social‬

Follow
Compare Alito’s description of Trump’s racist statements (on the left) to Justice Kagan’s anthology of Trump’s racist statements (on the right). These are passages from this morning’s opinions in Mullin v. Doe.

Compare Alito's description of Trump's racist statements (on the left) to Justice Kagan's anthology of Trump's racist statements (on the right). These are passages from this morning's opinions in Mullin v. Doe.

Jameel Jaffer (@jameeljaffer.bsky.social) 2026-06-25T14:37:23.673Z

Will Stancil

‪@whstancil.bsky.social‬

Follow
The reasoning here is absurd enough that it should be part of the story:

“Supreme Court rules that Trump statements that Haitians ‘probably have AIDS,’ are ‘poisoning the blood of our country,’ are ‘eating cats and dogs,” do not constitute racial animus.”

The reasoning here is absurd enough that it should be part of the story:"Supreme Court rules that Trump statements that Haitians 'probably have AIDS,' are 'poisoning the blood of our country,' are 'eating cats and dogs," do not constitute racial animus."

Will Stancil (@whstancil.bsky.social) 2026-06-25T14:58:33.066Z

Will Stancil

‪@whstancil.bsky.social‬

Follow
For decades, the Court has limited constitutional remedies for racial discrimination by making it harder to prove that discrimination occurred. We’ve reached the final manifestation of that trend: the president using white supremacist rhetoric and the Court saying “Doesn’t look like anything to me.”
10:01 AM · Jun 25, 2026

For decades, the Court has limited constitutional remedies for racial discrimination by making it harder to prove that discrimination occurred. We've reached the final manifestation of that trend: the president using white supremacist rhetoric and the Court saying "Doesn't look like anything to me."

Will Stancil (@whstancil.bsky.social) 2026-06-25T15:01:01.660Z

Will Stancil

‪@whstancil.bsky.social‬

Follow
It’s genuinely unclear what kind of statement could constitute racial discrimination at this point. Maybe if you provided a notarized statement explaining that you specifically hate black people because of the color of their skin?
10:03 AM · Jun 25, 2026
https://bsky.app/profile/whstancil.bsky.social/post/3mp4patl22k2l

Continue reading

Posted in Breaking News, Current Events, Environment, Gun control, Open Thread, Politics, Supreme Court | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Open Thread | Only A Fool Would Have Believed That Dobbs Was About ‘ States Rights’

No, it was never about being ‘ left to the states’. The right-wing wants to impose its will on the entire country.

So Much for Leaving Abortion Up to the States
Louisiana’s case against the FDA is not just about one drug.
By Adam Serwer
June 14, 2026, 7:31 AM ET

The 2022 Dobbs decision, which overturned Roe v. Wade, supposedly gave states the authority to decide for themselves whether to permit abortion. What should have been apparent then, and is obvious now, is that anti-abortion activists and their allies on the high court were never going to be satisfied with that.

Since October, the state of Louisiana has been seeking to block the distribution of mifepristone, a drug used to induce abortion, through the mail—not just in Louisiana, but anywhere in the United States. The state’s lawsuit against the FDA asserts that the Comstock Act—an anti-obscenity law championed by the 19th-century book burner Anthony Comstock—bans the mailing of abortion medication, and that the federal government wrongly repealed the in-person requirement for prescribing it.

“Louisiana is complaining about reported harms in Louisiana, but they would be imposing a nationwide requirement that patients pick up the pill in person from their health-care provider, even in states that protect abortion access, even in states that explicitly, in their laws, allow for telemedicine provision of mifepristone,” Andrew Beck, an attorney with the ACLU, told me. “Louisiana is really trying to impose its own policy choices on the entire country.”

Medication abortion accounts for about two-thirds of all abortions in the United States, which have actually increased since Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization made it possible to send mifepristone through the mail. Providers were first able to mail the drug during the pandemic, a temporary measure that was made permanent by the FDA in 2023. Even in Louisiana, which has a strict anti-abortion law with few exceptions, the number of abortions has risen, according to the state’s lawsuit. This was in part because Louisianans were able to access abortion drugs through providers based in states where the procedure is legal. Indeed—abortion medication has made it possible for women who live far from any clinic to end unwanted pregnancies. Many of those pro-abortion-rights states had passed “shield laws” that protected providers in their jurisdictions from being sued or prosecuted by authorities in anti-abortion states.

Although Louisiana v. FDA is ostensibly about a federal regulatory decision and the safety of an abortion drug, it is really about access to abortion. Louisiana even began its complaint with the declaration that “the fight for life is far from over.” The FDA has asked the court to hold off on a ruling for now, as the Trump administration has said it is conducting its own review of the drug (all medical evidence indicates that mifepristone is safe). In the meantime, two drug companies are asking the courts to allow the continued distribution of mifepristone. The Supreme Court responded to this question on May 14, overturning a lower order that halted distribution and sending the case back for review. The late Justice Antonin Scalia once predicted that overturning Roe would get the Court out of the “abortion-umpiring business.” That prediction has not aged well.
Continue reading

Posted in Abortion, Abortion Rights, Body Autonomy, Open Thread, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 27 Comments

Open Thread | Please Be On The Lookout…As Voters, We Have to Stay Vigilant

He_art_dave
‪@producerdave.bsky.social‬

Follow
i got a 3rd party very official looking “voter registration” mailer today. took 40 seconds of googling to see its a pac front. go to the official site in your state and check you are registered to vote. dont use third party mailers.

‪He_art_dave‬
‪@producerdave.bsky.social‬
· 11h
It was a 501c4 so the legality is grey imo. I could have filled it out, and it might have messed up my current registration. Someone could grab it, and fill out a new person, the form had my address prefilled.
W/ everything going on its just …

fuck.
7:56 PM · Jun 8, 2026

He_art_dave
‪@producerdave.bsky.social‬

Follow
Thats the thing it was a real registration form. But those “charity” non-profits shouldnt send the form prefilled out.
I get it. could be either side. getting people to register but with everything politics being pushed into confusions, its better everyones paying attention. Look at who sends what.

https://bsky.app/profile/producerdave.bsky.social/post/3mntfxexbos24

Please be on the lookout for mailers like this.
1. Call up your local election jurisdiction. ASK THEM if they have sent out any Official Election Mailers.
2. Ask for an email address to the Head of Voter Registration. Election jurisdictions don’t know what groups are doing out there. By you calling them up and sending them a copy of the mailer, you are helping them, because they will have an answer for the next voter that calls. And, if they have a sample, they can talk with the next voter and describe it perfectly.

Election jurisdictions don’t only get calls from voters. They might get calls from the local alderperson, council person, municipal clerk, who have been contacted by voters. If they know about it, and have a sample, they can send the copy to them, and they will be able to serve their constituents better.

3. Ask to talk to the Legal Counsel for the Election Jurisdiction. Putting the group on the radar of the Legal Counsel is a good thing.

4. If you find out from the election jurisdiction that it’s NOT FROM THEM, then post it on your social media, so that you can warn others.

5. This doesn’t just have to be voter registration applications. It’s also done with MAIL BALLOT APPLICATIONS.

DO NOT FILL OUT A MAIL BALLOT APPLICATION UNLESS YOU KNOW THAT IT’S FROM THE ELECTION JURISDICTION. Check and see if your Election Jurisdiction has the option for you to complete a Mail Ballot Application ONLINE AT THEIR WEBSITE. If they do, please use that method.
If you want to complete a paper Mail Ballot application, go get the ones that they have ON THEIR WEBSITE and download it for yourself.
I wouldn’t trust a Voter Registration or Mail Ballot Application that comes from a Third Party in the Mail.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 26 Comments