Here you go, Rikyrah. BWA HA HA HA
In response to this spectacle:
Mr. Paul, your’e NO Mr. Smith!
Here you go, Rikyrah. BWA HA HA HA
In response to this spectacle:
Mr. Paul, your’e NO Mr. Smith!
Even though 3Chics Politico is written and curated by three women: Ametia, Rikyrah, and SouthernGirl2, I must nominate this as one of the most engaging blogs I've found. Devoted to politics and culture, these three shine a light on contemporary life with humor and spirit.
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
You ladies are writing a play—seriously, good stuff with a sharp viewpoint—thanks, I enjoy this blog-never quite know where you’re going to go next!
Hi Marla! Nice to see your fonts grace our blog.
Hi Marla. Thank you for dropping by. We do our best to provide entertainment, as well as inform.
that letter is funnier than a mutha.
where is our side eye gif?
RAND PAUL =
Memo to Rand Paul: DRONE ON ABOUT JOBS FOR THE POOR, DESTITUE CACs 2520s in KENTUCKY!
Looks like Holder should have just done the principal thing and called Ayn Rand Paul into his office and bitchslapped him there, as well as send his ass home with that letter.
BWA HA HA HA
Lookie at these 2 CLOWNS
What a group of wishy washy whiney hineys.
Seriously, Miss Lindsay needs to quit having the vapors about big Black men taking her over…oh, wait…..!
I think they have been told to clamp down on this rhetoric. The GOP knows damned well nobody committed more WAR CRIMES than GEORGE W. BUSH. No they want to act like PBO’s going to kill innocent Americans. GTFOH
Lol!
LOL CRAPTACULAR SPECTACLE.
No Mr. Smith for sure because I didn’t see a bunch of mailbags being brought in. But you have to give the dear boy credit for making the effort . . . vain as it might be. Snark!
Hi John.
What Rand Paul Really Thinks About Drones
By Hayes Brown on Mar 7, 2013 at 11:25 am
While the White House has so far ignored calls to declassify the Department of Justice memos laying out the administration’s legal argument, it has explained that drone strikes could not Constitutionally be carried out against an individual who was not an imminent threat, effectively answering Paul’s limited question.
Paul’s opposition to the use of drones began with his concerns about their use for surveillance purposes against U.S. citizens without a warrant. To this effect, Paul introduced in 2012 what he called the “Preserving Freedom From Unwarranted Surveillance Act,” that would ”prohibit the use of drones by the government” without a warrant. The Pentagon has pushed back against the need for this new legislation, arguing that the laws that apply to manned aircraft — such as small airplanes and helicopters — would necessarily apply to unmanned drones as well.
That worry about drones is not universal for Paul, however, as he’s less concerned when it comes to enforcing border security via drone. Laying out his stance on comprehensive immigration reform, Paul published an op-ed in the Washington Times making clear that he felt that border security had to be addressed before a path to citizenship could be enacted.
Border security, including drones, satellite and physical barriers, vigilant deportation of criminals and increased patrols would begin immediately and would be assessed at the end of one year by an investigator general from the Government Accountability Office.
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2013/03/07/1685411/what-rand-paul-really-thinks-about-drones/