Officer #RayTensing on Trial for the Murder of #SamDuBose Day 5

judge-megan-shanahan-44Ray Tensing was not dragged by the car Sam DuBose was driving before the former UC police officer shot and killed DuBose, a forensic video analyst testified during Tensing’s trial Thursday.

Tensing is accused of murder and voluntary manslaughter in the death of DuBose, an unarmed motorist Tensing shot during a traffic stop in July 2015.

Grant Fredericks of Forensic Video Solutions showed the jury a frame-by-frame analysis of video of the shooting captured by Tensing’s body camera.

Tensing’s defense is that he was being dragged by the car and in fear of his life when he fired the fatal shot. Prosecutors say that the shooting was unwarranted and that Tensing was not dragged.

Based on Fredericks’ analysis, milliseconds could determine Tensing’s fate.

The jury watched as Fredericks pointed to landmarks to support his view that DuBose’s car barely moved, if at all, before Tensing pulled the trigger.

“We can see that the SUV in the driveway, the background, the position of the fence is as it was a few seconds earlier.” Fredericks testified. “So the background hasn’t changed. That means the vehicle hasn’t moved forward.”

At this point, the body cam footage showed what was happening one second and 875 milliseconds before DuBose was killed.

Fredericks said that the officer was not dragged, and that the car moved only one or two feet and only in the eight tenths of a second before Tensing fired the shot.

Just a fraction before DuBose died, Fredericks showed another video frame.

“You see the SUV still in the background,” Fredericks told assistant prosecutor Mark Piepmeier. “So the forward motion of the car would have been very short, very small.”

During cross-examination, Tensing’s attorney, Stew Mathews, seized on the words ’forward motion,’ trying to convince the jury that any motion of DuBose’s car put his client’s life on the line.

“You would agree with me that ultimately the jury has to make up their own minds about what this video shows,” Mathews asked Fredericks.

“Is that a fair statement on my part?” Mathews asked.

Fredericks said, “I agree with that. Yes.”

After court, Mathews said that’s a big deal for his client.

“He took 45 minutes to present something that happened in a few seconds,” Mathews said. “One thing I took away from it was that the car was in motion when the shot was fired, which is our (argument) throughout.”

Sam DuBose’s sister disagrees and says Mathews is just trying to confuse the jury.

“I think he tried to discredit what they had just seen,” Terina Allen said. “I think any reasonable person saw what they saw in the video, and it was very much made clear with that frame-by-frame. I really am thankful for that.”

Hamilton County Prosecutor Joe Deters said that Thursday’s testimony was a win for the state.

“The camera doesn’t lie,” Deters said. “And we brought in maybe the best video expert in the country and he was stunningly good on the witness stand.”

About SouthernGirl2

A Native Texan who adores baby kittens, loves horses, rodeos, pomegranates, & collect Eagles. Enjoys politics, games shows, & dancing to all types of music. Loves discussing and learning about different cultures. A Phi Theta Kappa lifetime member with a passion for Social & Civil Justice.
This entry was posted in Black Lives Matter, crime, Current Events, Institutional Racism, Jim Crow laws, Justice, JusticeForSamDuBose, News, Open Thread, Photos, Police bruality, Police violence, Racial Oppression, Racism, Violence, White Supremacy and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

147 Responses to Officer #RayTensing on Trial for the Murder of #SamDuBose Day 5

  1. yahtzeebutterfly says:


    • yahtzeebutterfly says:


  2. yahtzeebutterfly says:


  3. Kathleen O'Neill says:

    I’ve never heard of a trial during which the media asks for jury questionnaires. The Enquirer sucks. Regarding local Cincinnati coverage, my opinion is that WLWT is the best. In 2012, WCPO investigated “voter fraud” in Hamilton County and it turned out that one African American poll worker voted more than once. They procreated that poultry constantly as evidence of their investigative prowess. My take is that the sub text was, “See! Blah people really did steal the election” to pander to their desired affluent white, exurb demographic. I detest that station (Tom McKee was the reporter on that, btw). Channel 12 WKRC is owned by Sinclair, a far right media company that believes in a theocracy. I hate that station, too. Fox 19 is not too bad believe it or not.
    I’m sick of white people claiming “fearing for their lives” just because they encounter an African American. Right now I’m sick of white people period. And I’m white.

    Thanks for this update, SouthernGirl2. I just can’t turn the “news” on anymore because it’s polluted with anti Hillary propaganda. Thank you for letting me rant!


  4. Tensing was wearing a shirt with a confederate flag on it while on duty. I don’t think so either, Ms DuBose. Not one bit remorseful.


  5. Like

  6. Like

  7. Like

  8. Like

  9. Why won’t the Enquirer go sit down and go away? Always with drama!


  10. Like

  11. Like

  12. Like

  13. Like

  14. Like

  15. Like

  16. Like

  17. Like

  18. Like

  19. Like

  20. Like

  21. Like

  22. Like

  23. Like

  24. Like

  25. Like

  26. Like

  27. Like

  28. Like

  29. I don’t know what’s going on. Stay tuned, folks


  30. Like

  31. Like

  32. Like

  33. Like

  34. Like

  35. Like

  36. Like

  37. Like

  38. Like

  39. Liked by 1 person

  40. Liked by 1 person

  41. Liked by 1 person

  42. Liked by 1 person

  43. RayTensing shirt he was wearing underneath his uniform. Confederate flag, y’all.

    Liked by 1 person

  44. Like

  45. Like

  46. Like

  47. Like

  48. Like

  49. Like

  50. Like

  51. Like

  52. Please God. Give her strength.


  53. Like

  54. Like

  55. Like

  56. WTF?


  57. Like

  58. Like

  59. Like

  60. Like

  61. Like

  62. Like

  63. Oh God!


  64. Liked by 1 person

  65. Liked by 1 person

  66. Liked by 1 person

  67. Liked by 1 person

  68. Liked by 1 person


    Liked by 1 person

  70. Like

  71. Liked by 1 person

  72. Like

  73. Like

  74. Like

  75. Like

  76. Like

  77. Like

  78. Like

  79. Liked by 1 person

  80. Liked by 1 person

  81. OOPS!

    Liked by 1 person

  82. You’re going to prison, buddy!

    Liked by 1 person

  83. Liked by 1 person

  84. Liked by 1 person

  85. Like

  86. Like

  87. Like

  88. Liked by 1 person

  89. Like

  90. Liked by 1 person

  91. Liked by 1 person

  92. Liked by 1 person

  93. Like

  94. Like

  95. Like

  96. Like

  97. Like

  98. Snickering?


  99. Like

  100. Like

  101. Like

  102. Like

  103. Like

  104. Like

  105. Like

  106. Like

  107. Like

  108. Like

  109. Like

  110. Like

  111. Like

  112. Like

  113. Like

  114. Like

  115. Like

  116. Like

  117. Like

  118. Liked by 1 person

  119. Liked by 1 person

  120. Liked by 1 person

  121. Liked by 1 person

  122. Like

  123. Liked by 1 person

  124. Liked by 1 person

  125. Liked by 1 person

  126. Liked by 1 person

  127. Liked by 1 person

  128. Liked by 1 person

  129. Liked by 1 person

  130. Liked by 1 person

  131. Liked by 1 person

  132. Liked by 1 person

  133. Liked by 1 person

  134. Liked by 1 person

  135. Liked by 1 person

  136. Liked by 1 person

  137. Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.